LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 3 FEBRUARY 2017
HOBART
There will be an Ecumenical Service for the opening of the Law Year at St David’s Cathedral, Murray Street, Hobart at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, 3 February 2017.
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
Details
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 3 February 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 25
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 25
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case involved a dispute between two parties, though their names are not disclosed in the extract. The nature of the dispute is not specified, but it is clear that the court was to hear and decide on the matter. The case was scheduled to be heard in Hobart on Friday, 3 February 2017, the opening day of the law year, which is marked by an Ecumenical Service at St David’s Cathedral. No other lists for Launceston and Burnie are noted for that date.
The legal issues the court needed to resolve were not detailed in the extract. Given that it is a Supreme Court case, the issues likely pertained to significant legal matters, potentially involving contractual disputes, property rights, or other civil matters of considerable importance. The court was tasked with interpreting relevant laws, examining evidence, and delivering a judgement based on the presented arguments and facts.
The reasoning and outcome of the case are not provided in the extract. Typically, a Supreme Court judgement would include a thorough analysis of the relevant legal principles, an examination of the evidence, and a reasoned conclusion based on that evidence. The outcome would either resolve the dispute in favour of one party or the other, or it might involve a more nuanced decision that addresses specific aspects of the case. The court's decision would be detailed in a written judgement, which would be made available subsequently.
No specific orders were mentioned in the extract. However, the final orders of the court would likely include directions for any further actions, costs, and any other necessary mandates to enforce the judgement.
The legal issues the court needed to resolve were not detailed in the extract. Given that it is a Supreme Court case, the issues likely pertained to significant legal matters, potentially involving contractual disputes, property rights, or other civil matters of considerable importance. The court was tasked with interpreting relevant laws, examining evidence, and delivering a judgement based on the presented arguments and facts.
The reasoning and outcome of the case are not provided in the extract. Typically, a Supreme Court judgement would include a thorough analysis of the relevant legal principles, an examination of the evidence, and a reasoned conclusion based on that evidence. The outcome would either resolve the dispute in favour of one party or the other, or it might involve a more nuanced decision that addresses specific aspects of the case. The court's decision would be detailed in a written judgement, which would be made available subsequently.
No specific orders were mentioned in the extract. However, the final orders of the court would likely include directions for any further actions, costs, and any other necessary mandates to enforce the judgement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.