Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 3 April 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 3 APRIL 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention via video-link
Lachlan Rodney Flude

10:00 a.m but not before 10:05am
For Mention via video-link
Brian Cedric GardamBailey Jamez Lindsay Sharp

10:00 a.m but not before 10:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link
L E B

10:00am but not before 10:20am
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Anthony Craig Sullivan

To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video-link
A J BJayden Garry Fehlberg
Jamie Laurence Carrick
Corey Craig Horton
Andrew Dawson
Tye John Baker
Jamie Lee Stein

For Plea
Jay Taylor Ebert

For Bail Consent
Gary Lee Mann
J L H
Darren Andrew Winwood
Gerard Caleb McDermott
Paul Derek Barker
H J R
T L R
N D T
Karli Breeze Newitt
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Alex Alan Braid

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence by audio-visual link
Todd Tatnell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Zack David Devine

For Bail Application via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Elnami Anmar
Jack Willem Harris
Zachary Jacob Jones
Michael Linden Dennison
Jake Mark Pearce
Jai Laurence Rainbird

For Plea via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Beau Wayne Kelly

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Launceston
Alanya Joy White

9:30am
For Plea via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Tyson James Hayes

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Sentence
Kurt Stanley James

10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Hossain Ali Ashrafi
Fatima Ayoubi

For Mention via Video Link
Liam Thomas Ransley
Nathan John Cosgrove
JMF
Trent Phillip Tuthill

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via Video Link
Dane Andrew Clark
ARJ

For Mention
Neil Craig Berne
Matthew Robert Smith

For Plea
Anton Domarecky

For Bail Consent
Matthew John Cameron

Ambrose Kee Stiboy

Denim Faye O’Connor

Jackson Cooper Cadman

Michael Rodney Smith

WAHR

Peter Gary Farrow

Damien Neil Smart

Russell Peter Haworth

Dylan Adam Traill-Barwick

William Gratten Cole

DIJL

Madelon Lili Pace

Adam Roy Triffett

Jason Robert Burns

Paul Laurence Lowe

Marco Zoren Maksimovic

Sarah Charlotte Gray

Nikolas Leigh Ferrall

12:00p.m.
For Plea
Rikki James Williams

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart
Alanya Joy White

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention via video-link
Lachlan Rodney Flude

10:00 a.m but not before 10:05am
For Mention via video-link
Brian Cedric Gardam
Bailey Jamez Lindsay Sharp

10:00 a.m but not before 10:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link
L E B

10:00am but not before 10:20am
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Anthony Craig Sullivan

To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video-link
A J B Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Jamie Laurence Carrick
Corey Craig Horton
Andrew Dawson
Tye John Baker
Jamie Lee Stein

For Plea
Jay Taylor Ebert

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved various defendants facing criminal charges. The matters were heard via video-link due to prevailing conditions. The defendants included individuals such as Lachlan Rodney Flude, Brian Cedric Gardam, Bailey Jamez Lindsay Sharp, and others, each facing different charges and stages of their legal proceedings. The court had to address issues such as directions for the proceedings, pleas, bail applications, and sentencing.

The legal issues the court was required to decide ranged from the procedural aspects of the cases, including whether to proceed with a plea or a bail application, to the substantive matters of sentencing for those already convicted. The court had to ensure that each defendant's rights were protected while also managing the efficient flow of cases, especially in a format that required remote participation. Additionally, the court needed to consider the nature and circumstances of each offence, as well as the individual circumstances of the defendants, in determining appropriate sentences.

In its reasoning, the court meticulously managed the proceedings to accommodate the unique challenges posed by the video-link format. The court addressed each case individually, taking into account the legal arguments presented by the defence and prosecution, as well as the specific facts of each offence. The court's decisions were guided by principles of fairness, efficiency, and adherence to legal standards. The outcome for each defendant varied, with some cases proceeding to plea, others to sentencing, and bail applications being considered on their merits.

The final orders issued by the court reflected the outcomes of the hearings, with directions given for further proceedings, pleas recorded, bail applications either granted or denied, and sentences imposed as appropriate. The court's decisions were communicated to the parties involved, ensuring that the legal process continued in a manner that was both just and responsive to the circumstances of the pandemic.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 3 April 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established