Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 28 September 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 28 SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Amir Lee
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Mitchell John Campbell
Wade Richard Burgess
Matthew Clifford Hingston
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
Jacob Vernon Hardy
JB
Cody David Brown

For Directions Hearing
Daniel Robert Griffith
Peter Glenn Howlett
Jye David Cowen
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
Scott Darrell Rhodes
Craig Raymond Silva
Jason Darrall Triffett
Shannon Myree Arnold
Luke George Jones
Nathan Victor Lockley
JSR
Leigh Dittman

For Plea
Wayne Andrew Fenton

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Christopher Lewis Emery

For Sentencing Submissions
John Michael Large

For Bail Consent
Stuart Norton Woods
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Craig Andrew Rickards
David Shaw
Leeanne Rosemary Coleman
Aaron Campbell Brumley
Michael John Benjamin Wells
Marcus Alexander Clayton
Jason Dale Downie
HFR
AH

Not Before 11:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
Christopher Richard Stevenson
Christopher John Worker

For Bail Application
Noah Neptune Weiss-Trew
Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Brendan James McGuire

For Bail Application via video link to
Court 2 Launceston Supreme Court
James Michael Fitzgerald

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Michael Hopkinson

For Bail Application
Lai Le

For Remittal Application
Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley
Alexander James Shepherd

For Application
Leigh John Parker

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone conference
Kim Haines
V
Cliff Martindale

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
MDR
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00amFor Sentence by Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Corey Joseph Ford

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Gary Graeme Musicka

2:15pm For Sentencing Submissions
Christo Brown

For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1 Hobart Supreme Court

James Michael Fitzgerald

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania was a compilation of various criminal and civil matters. Among the criminal cases, notable mentions include the plea and sentencing submissions for John Michael Large, bail applications for Noah Neptune Weiss-Trew and Troy Richard Vernon Lovell, and a remittal application by Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley and Alexander James Shepherd. On the civil side, a directions hearing was scheduled for Kim Haines V Cliff Martindale. The court was tasked with managing these cases through trials, hearings, and applications, ensuring that all legal processes were followed appropriately.

The legal issues the court had to decide ranged from the admissibility of evidence in ongoing trials, the appropriateness of bail conditions, the procedural correctness of remand applications, and the legal arguments presented in sentencing submissions. Each case brought unique legal questions that needed to be addressed, such as whether the defendant's rights were upheld, the likelihood of the accused reoffending if released on bail, and the adequacy of the evidence presented. The court's role was to interpret the law, weigh the evidence, and make decisions that adhered to legal standards and principles.

Justice Wood, presiding over the Hobart sessions, and Justice Porter, handling matters in Launceston, provided detailed rulings based on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and arguments, applying relevant statutes and case law to reach its decisions. For instance, in the matter involving John Michael Large, the court considered the sentencing submissions and the legal precedents to determine an appropriate sentence. Similarly, in the bail applications, the court assessed the risk factors and the likelihood of the applicants appearing in court if granted bail.

The final orders made by the court varied across the cases, reflecting the outcomes of the hearings and trials. Some defendants had their bail applications approved or varied, while others faced sentencing. The court ensured that all procedural requirements were met, and legal rights were protected. The orders were detailed and specific, providing clear directives for the next steps in each case.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 28 September 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established