Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Friday 26 April 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 87


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 26 APRIL 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
A Witness on Final Notice

For Sentence via Video Link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
and Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
NCG

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video Link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
A Witness on Final Notice

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Sentence via Video Link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
NCG

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Friday 26 April 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 87
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 87
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving NCG, a defendant who appeared for sentencing via a video link from Burnie. Acting Justice Porter presided over the proceedings. The defendant had previously pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a dangerous drug, specifically cocaine, and was subject to a final notice from a witness. The matter was initially mentioned in Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart, but the sentencing was conducted via a video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie, and Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison. The primary legal issue the court had to decide was the appropriate sentence for the defendant, taking into account the nature of the offence, the defendant's background, and the impact of the offence on the community.

Acting Justice Porter considered the circumstances of the case, including the defendant's guilty plea, his previous criminal history, and the nature of the offence. The court also heard submissions from the prosecutor and the defendant's legal representative. In delivering the sentence, the Acting Justice emphasised the seriousness of possessing a dangerous drug and the potential harm such actions can cause to individuals and the community. The court took into account the defendant's cooperation with authorities and his previous good character. Ultimately, the Acting Justice sentenced the defendant to a period of imprisonment, followed by a period of community corrections. This decision balanced the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.

The court's final order was that the defendant, NCG, be remanded into custody pending transfer to a correctional facility to serve the imposed sentence. The court also directed that the defendant's legal representative be notified of the sentencing details. The decision reflects the court's consideration of both punitive and rehabilitative aspects of sentencing in cases involving drug offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.