LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 25 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Cosmas Paite
For Trial
Glenn Andrew Wakefield
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Risdon Prison Visitors Complex
Michael John Hopkinson
For Sentence
Christopher Kenneth Cook
Desiree Josephine Hunt
For Directions Hearing
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
Zeb Haas
Joel James Lorkin
Casey Therese Howlett
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Ricky Damien Brown
For Bail Consent
LAM
Not before 11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Darren Craig McGuiness
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Grant Andrew Crawford
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Joshua Blair Read
For Trial
DJT
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd
v
Simon John Cooper
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Grant Andrew Crawford
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 25 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 413
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 413
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether Paite met the criteria for bail under the Bail Act, specifically considering the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of Paite appearing in court, and the risk he posed to the community if released. The court had to weigh these factors carefully to decide whether Paite's release would unduly risk the safety of others or the administration of justice.
Justice Brett considered the evidence presented and the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. The court ultimately concluded that granting bail would not pose an undue risk to the community. Consequently, Paite was granted bail with specific conditions to ensure his compliance and to mitigate any potential risks. The court's decision was based on a detailed assessment of the evidence and the likelihood of Paite appearing in court.
The final orders of the court included setting specific bail conditions that Paite must adhere to, such as residing at a specified address, reporting to a bail supervisor, and refraining from certain activities. These conditions were intended to balance the interests of justice with the rights of the accused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.