Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 September 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Criminal Jurisdiction 12:00p.m. For Application to Vary Bail Joshua James...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 321


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Joshua James Barda

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
PAB

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
JAR

2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
PAB

Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 321
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Chief Justice Blow presided over an application by Joshua James Barda to vary his existing bail conditions. The dispute centred around the adequacy of the current bail terms, which the applicant argued were overly restrictive and not proportionate to the risk he posed. The court was tasked with determining whether the existing bail conditions should be altered in light of new circumstances or evidence presented.

The primary legal issue for the court was whether the existing bail conditions were appropriate in the current context, considering the potential risk to the community and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. The court had to balance the rights of the accused to liberty against the need to protect the community. It also had to consider the principles of proportionality and fairness in bail decisions.

The court, after hearing arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, found that the existing bail conditions were still necessary to ensure the safety of the community and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. The Chief Justice concluded that there was no compelling reason to vary the current bail terms, given the risk factors and the evidence presented. The application was thus dismissed.

No further orders were made by the court, and the existing bail conditions remained in place.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.