Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 24 May 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 108

24th May, 2019

HOBART

Court Number 1

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

David James Fysh

For directions hearing (by telephone)

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Joshua Robin Oakley

For directions hearing (by video link) to Risdon Prison Complex

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Tye Paul Silver

For directions hearing (by video link) to Risdon Prison Complex

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Aaron Henderson Gray

For directions hearing (by video link) to Risdon Prison Complex

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Drew Alexander Jones

For directions hearing (by video link) to Risdon Prison Complex

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Wade Richard Burgess

For directions hearing (by video link) to Ron Barwick

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Tim Mutro

For directions hearing (by video link)

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Samuel Peter Newell

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

BP

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Jacob Anthony Burdon

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Natasha Lyn Davie

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Peter John O'Neill

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Wade Alan Charles Cowmeadow

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Jason Darrall Triffett

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

DTN

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Katherine Erica Brown

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Chris Byers Rossi

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Narelle Maree O'Rourke

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Scott Steven Saxelby

For directions hearing

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Todd Andrew Tatnell

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Nicholas John Barrett

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Jordan Peter Poland

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

James Stuart Walker

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

JSP

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Jessica Gay Schreiweis

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

PJS

For bail consent

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Ariene Maree Taylor

For sentencing submissions (by video link)

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Erica Helen Bennett

For sentencing submissions

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Luke Murray John Jago

For facts and sentence

Acting Justice Porter

10:00 am | Criminal

Brodie Norman Barwick

For facts and sentence

Acting Justice Porter

12:00 pm | Criminal

Brodie John Self

For bail application

HOBART

Court Number 2

Justice Brett

10:00 am | Criminal

Brendan David Cranston

For Sentencing Submissions

HOBART

Court Number 3

Associate Justice Holt

9:15 am | Civil

Permanent Custodians Limited v Tanya Maree McKinnell

Possession via video link to Burnie

Associate Justice Holt

9:15 am | Civil

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Anthony Terence White & Anor

Possession via video link to Burnie

Associate Justice Holt

10:00 am | Civil

Sante Santesso & Anor

Set down for hearing

Associate Justice Holt

11:30 am | Civil

Julia Pycroft v Nadina Marie Pycroft

For Dismissal

HOBART

Court Number 7

Justice Estcourt

9:45 am | Criminal

Christopher Vernon Clark

For mention (by video link)

Justice Estcourt

9:45 am | Criminal

Magnus Colby Oakley

For mention (by video link)

Justice Estcourt

9:45 am | Criminal

Jodie Essie Latham

For mention (by video link)

Justice Estcourt

10:00 am | Criminal

Jye David Cowen

For bail application

Justice Estcourt

10:00 am | Criminal

Ronnie John Williams

For bail application

Justice Estcourt

2:15 pm | Criminal

Matthew John Davey v State of Tasmania

For directions hearing

Justice Estcourt

2:15 pm | Criminal

Rodney Gene Crosswell

For legal argument

Justice Estcourt

4:00 pm | Criminal

Dimitrios Eli Howell

For mention

Justice Estcourt

4:00 pm | Criminal

Timothy David Rainbird

For mention

Justice Estcourt

4:00 pm | Criminal

Stephen Thomas Hay

For mention

HOBART

Court Number 8

Justice Pearce

9:15 am | Criminal

Dallas John Eaves

For trial (part heard)

Justice Pearce

9:30 am | Appeal

Emilia Olive Harwood

For directions hearing

Justice Pearce

11:00 am | Criminal

Malcolm Pilgrim

For hearing (part heard)

Justice Pearce

11:00 am | Criminal

Michelle Woolley

For hearing (part heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court Number 1

Justice Wood

1:00 pm | Criminal

IBF

For directions hearing (by video link)

BURNIE

Court Number 1

Justice Wood

10:00 am | Criminal

Darren Gale Ward

For trial (part heard)

Justice Wood

1:00 pm | Criminal

IBF

For directions hearing (by video link)

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 24 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 108
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 108
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several criminal cases, presided over by Acting Justice Porter, Justice Brett, Justice Estcourt, Justice Holt, and Justice Pearce. The cases involved various defendants, each facing different criminal charges, and were primarily focused on bail applications, directions hearings, and sentencing submissions. The court also handled a civil case involving Permanent Custodians Limited v Tanya Maree McKinnell, which pertained to a possession matter.

The primary legal issues addressed in these cases encompassed bail eligibility for defendants, the establishment of trial dates, and the determination of appropriate sentences. The court had to consider factors such as the seriousness of the alleged offences, the risk of flight, community safety, and the likelihood of reoffending. In the civil case, the court was required to adjudicate on the dispute regarding the possession of property.

Acting Justice Porter and other justices evaluated the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both the prosecution and the defence. The court took into account the legal principles and precedents to arrive at its decisions. The justices considered the rights of the accused, the principles of natural justice, and the need for a fair trial. In the civil case, the court assessed the ownership and possession of the property in question based on the presented evidence.

The outcomes of the cases varied. In the criminal cases, some defendants were granted bail, while others had their trials scheduled, and sentences were imposed. The court also made a ruling in the civil case regarding the possession of property. Specific details of the rulings and sentences were not provided in the summary, but the court's decisions were based on the legal arguments and evidence presented during the hearings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.