LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 24 JUNE 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Benjamin Angus Shield
For Trial
Adrian Eugene Kelleher
(Part-Heard)
In Court as In Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
NHC
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Raphan Stuart McLeod
JCP
For Plea
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Jay John Bradford
Niall Robert King
Connie Gladys Stephenson
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (Part Heard)
Gregory John Medcraft
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
10:00am
For Sentence
Johnathon Rex Keogh
To Follow
For Decision
Benjamin Edward Bakes
To Follow
For Trial (Empanelment Only)
Chad Richard Talbott
11:00am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Timothy Peter Hingston
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 June 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 127
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined Shield's circumstances, including his criminal history, the seriousness of the offence, and the likelihood of him appearing in court if granted bail. The court also considered the interests of the community and any risk that Shield may pose if released. The court found that Shield met the criteria for bail, and there were no factors that would weigh against granting bail. As such, the court granted Shield bail.
The final orders of the court were that Shield be released on bail, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included that Shield report to a designated police station on a regular basis, refrain from contacting certain individuals, and abide by a curfew. Shield was also required to surrender his passport and any travel documents. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant factors and a finding that Shield met the criteria for bail.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.