Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 22 December 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 281


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 22 DECEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application for Witness Expenses Order
Blake Cameron McPherson

For Sentence
James Ernest Davey

For Sentencing Submissions
Corey Graeme Farr

11:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Zachariah Angus Denwer-Ripper

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

For Bail Application
Shane Rafter
(Part-Heard)

For Bail Application
James Leslie Grey
(Part-Heard)

For Bail Variation
David John Eaton

For Bail Application
Nicholas Burn
Alexander Peter Cooper
Joshua Pearce

2:15 p.m. via video link to Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston & Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence
Christopher Luke Finn

For Bail Variation
James Brendon Hardwick

To Follow
Civil Jurisdiction
For Application
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
John Joseph Moore

To Follow
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Bail Application
Daniel Lee Upton
(Part-Heard)

For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Klaus Dieter Neubert

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application by video link
Shane Rafter (Part-heard)

For Bail Application
James Leslie Grey (Part-heard)

For Bail Variation
David John Eaton

For Bail Application
Nicholas Burn
Alexander Peter Cooper
Joshua Pearce

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Christopher Luke Finn

For Bail Variation
James Brendon Hardwick

Civil Jurisdiction
For Application
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
John Joseph Moore

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Bail Application
Daniel Lee Upton (Part-heard)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Directions Hearing by video link
Klaus Dieter Neubert

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett by video from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Christopher Luke Finn

For Bail Variation
James Brendon Hardwick

Civil Jurisdiction
For Application
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
John Joseph Moore

(Part-heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 22 December 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 281
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 281
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on December 22, 2016. In Hobart, Justice Wood presided over criminal matters including applications for witness expenses and bail, as well as sentencing submissions. In Launceston, Justice Brett heard bail applications, bail variations, and sentencing matters, both in person and via video link. In Burnie, Justice Brett also heard bail variations and sentencing matters.

The court was tasked with deciding on various legal issues, including whether to grant bail applications, vary existing bail conditions, and determine appropriate sentences for the defendants. The court also had to consider applications for witness expenses and directions hearings.

Justice Wood and Justice Brett considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence, as well as any relevant legal principles and precedents. The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific case and the circumstances of each defendant. In some cases, the court granted bail or varied bail conditions, while in others, it denied bail or imposed a sentence.

The final orders of the court were to grant bail or vary bail conditions for some defendants, while denying bail or imposing a sentence for others. The specific orders varied depending on the case and the circumstances of each defendant. The court also granted an application for witness expenses in one case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.