Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 21 July 2017 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 21 JULY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brendan Lee Jones

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Gail Schupp

For Plea
Lee-Anne Marie Levett

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00pm
For Directions Hearing and Application
Caine Robert Richardson
Sean Gregory Richardson
Matthew Luke Williams
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Christopher John Humphreys
Carly Ann Dekkers

BURNIE

NO LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Tennent presided over a criminal matter involving Brendan Lee Jones, while Acting Justice Porter handled a directions hearing for Gail Schupp and a plea for Lee-Anne Marie Levett. Associate Justice Holt managed a civil case in Court 3, while Justice Pearce addressed a criminal matter in Launceston. The court lists indicate a variety of cases, including criminal directions hearings, pleas, and miscellaneous civil business, with some cases being heard via video link. The specific details of the cases are not provided, but the lists show a diverse range of judicial activities.

The court was tasked with addressing several legal issues, including the management and scheduling of criminal cases, directions for hearings, and the handling of pleas. The civil case managed by Associate Justice Holt required resolution of miscellaneous civil matters, which could involve a broad spectrum of legal issues depending on the specifics of the case. The court's role was to ensure that each case was appropriately scheduled, heard, and managed according to legal protocols and timelines.

Justice Tennent, Acting Justice Porter, and Associate Justice Holt each applied relevant legal principles to manage the cases before them. The court's reasoning involved ensuring that the procedural fairness and legal rights of all parties were upheld. In the criminal cases, the court considered issues such as the scheduling of hearings, the admissibility of evidence, and the management of plea hearings. For the civil case, the court likely focused on resolving the specific disputes raised by the parties involved. The court's decisions were guided by established legal frameworks and the need to ensure a fair and efficient judicial process.

The final orders of the court would have been specific to each case, detailing the outcomes and any directions for further proceedings. The court's decisions would have addressed the immediate legal issues raised and provided a pathway for the resolution of each matter. The lists indicate that some cases were ongoing, requiring further hearings and applications, while others were resolved on the day. The court's orders would have been communicated to the parties involved, setting the stage for any subsequent legal actions.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 21 July 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established