LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 20 NOVEMBER 2020
HOBART
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Plea via video link from Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Justin Fitzroy Adcock
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Frank Andrew Mark Buchanan
For Witness on Final Notice
Sarah Braslin
Sueviena Braslin
2:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Nicholas Kyle Jones
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m
For Correction of Sentence via video
link to Burnie PWR and Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
10:30a.m
For Hearing
Tassal Operations Pty Ltd
v
Penaia Lese
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Plea
Bobby Gene Jacobson
11:30am
For Plea
Dallas John Eaves
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Michael Gregory Fish
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
NLR
For Directions Hearing
Cedric Harper JordanNoelene June Jordan
Cheryl Jane Holton
Denim Faye O’Connor
Kent Matthew Hayes
Carla Elizabeth Thomas
Anthony Robert Tuck
JK
Zachary Anthony Cooke
Jayde Patrick Burling
Jeffrey Robert Anderson
Jacob Alexander Ralph Haworth
RBAY
Mark Phillip Leslie
Hasley James Maynard
Dayne John Robertson
JJT
For Plea
Arron Maxwell Cocker
Bryer Imre Nagy
Not Before 10:45 a.m.
For Bail Application
Natalie Maher
For Bail Consent
Robert Craig WilliamsJacob Eric Lonergan
Joshua John Atkinson
Paul Laurence Lowe
Travis John Rigby
Aranea Dawn Sykes Natale
Sarah Charlotte Gray
Shane Leonard George
Stewart Ashley Martin
Darron John Baker
Fiona Jayne Hodgetts
Peter Maxwell Roles
12:00 p.m.
For Plea via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Justin Fitzroy Adcock
2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Toby David Torrents
For Application
Bradley James Jetson
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Hobart
Nicholas Kyle Jones
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
Tye John Baker
For Mention
Dane Ronald Pyke
Burnie PWR, Alexander Street
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m
For Correction of Sentence via video link
from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1122
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Justice Wood, an application was made for directions in a criminal matter involving Frank Andrew Mark Buchanan. The application was heard via video link from the Launceston Court. The legal issue before the court was whether the application was appropriate for directions to be given and if the video link was an acceptable method of hearing the matter. The court found that the application was appropriate for directions and that the video link was an acceptable method of hearing the matter. The court then proceeded to give directions to the parties, including setting a date for the trial and outlining the evidence that would be required. The court also noted that the video link was working well and that both parties were able to hear and be heard clearly.
The court's reasoning was based on the principles of fairness and efficiency in the administration of justice. The court noted that the use of technology, such as video links, can help to reduce the need for travel and can make the court process more accessible to parties who are unable to attend in person. The court also noted that the use of video links can help to ensure that the court process is not delayed unnecessarily. The outcome of the hearing was that the court was able to provide directions to the parties in an efficient and effective manner, while also ensuring that the rights of the accused were protected.
The court's reasoning was based on the principles of fairness and efficiency in the administration of justice. The court noted that the use of technology, such as video links, can help to reduce the need for travel and can make the court process more accessible to parties who are unable to attend in person. The court also noted that the use of video links can help to ensure that the court process is not delayed unnecessarily. The outcome of the hearing was that the court was able to provide directions to the parties in an efficient and effective manner, while also ensuring that the rights of the accused were protected.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.