Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 20 December 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 364


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 20 DECEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Brett Andrew ImlachCameron Scott ClarkBD

For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Stephen James Williams
Thomas James Aliano
Jesse James Pearce
Heath Michael Kelp
Chirack Mwanza Kadima
Not Before 11:45 a.m.
For Application
Jack Bradley Harvey
Steven Craig Murtagh

For Bail Application
Ingrid ClarkChanelle Lillian Bingham
Zachary Jacob Jones
Vincent Distefano
Michael Thomas Jones
Thomas John Douglas

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Sanders Moen Frith-Brown
v
Roberts Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.15 am
Nancy Carolann Jane White as executors of the will of Irene Vorlicek
v Galina Verjbitsky
Directions hearing

Coby James Howes v Natalie Mantan aka Howes
Interlocutory applications filed 15 August and 6 Sept 2019 – For hearing

Lee Andrew Davis v Saxon Graeme Jackson
Dismiss action

Barry Tasman Sharman v Vernon Wayne Lawson & Heather Yvonne Jones
as executors of the estate of Raymond John Jones
Originating application/Directions hearing

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
11 am
Leonard Fernandez

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stephen James Williams
Thomas James Aliano
Jesse James Pearce
Heath Michael Kelp
Chirack Mwanza Kadima

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
via video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.15 am
Nancy Carolann Jane White as executors of the will of Irene Vorlicek
v Galina Verjbitsky
Directions hearing

Coby James Howes v Natalie Mantan aka Howes
Interlocutory applications filed 15 August and 6 Sept 2019 – For hearing

Lee Andrew Davis v Saxon Graeme Jackson
Dismiss action

Barry Tasman Sharman v Vernon Wayne Lawson & Heather Yvonne Jones
as executors of the estate of Raymond John Jones
Originating application/Directions hearing

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 20 December 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 364
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 364
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several applications on 20 December 2019. Among the cases listed was Sanders Moen Frith-Brown v Roberts Ltd, which came before Justice Wood in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document, but it appears to be a civil matter.

The legal issues before the court were not explicitly stated in the document. However, it is likely that the court was required to determine the merits of the claim made by the plaintiff against the defendant. The court may have also had to consider any relevant evidence and arguments presented by both parties, as well as applicable legal principles and precedents.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the document. It is likely that the court heard submissions from both parties and made a decision based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court may have also considered relevant legal principles and precedents in reaching its decision. The final orders of the court were not stated in the document.

If the court found in favour of the plaintiff, it may have ordered the defendant to pay damages or other remedies as appropriate. Alternatively, if the court found in favour of the defendant, it may have dismissed the plaintiff's claim. The exact outcome of the case is not known without further information.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.