Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 17 July 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 795


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 17 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00am
For Decision via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex

Bruce Paton Anderson v Director of Public Prosecutions 

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15am
For Directions via Skype

Maverick Boyyd Cvetko Mark Antony Tours v Harvey John Charnock and anor

For Originating Application via Skype

Sandra Margaret Clark v Applegate Peter William

10:00am
For Directions Hearing via telephone

Phillip Martin Gumley and anor v Sarah Frances Bell

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Variation via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Zannon Tony Howard

Simon Dennison

For Bail Variation

Shyanne Nicole Devine

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Darren Pregnell

1:45pm

For Bail Application via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex

Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Preliminary proceedings applications

10.00 am

Natalie MAHER

2.15 pm

D G

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00am
For Decision via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex

Bruce Paton Anderson v Director of Public Prosecutions 

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Brett
1:45pm
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Bail Application via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex

Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Variation via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart 

Zannon Tony Howard

Simon Dennison

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 17 July 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 795
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 795
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, under Justice Brett, presided over a series of criminal and civil cases, conducted via various forms of remote communication, including video link and telephone. One notable criminal case involved Bruce Paton Anderson against the Director of Public Prosecutions, where the court was required to make a decision on a matter that was being heard from multiple locations. Another significant matter was the civil case between Maverick Boyyd Cvetko Mark Antony Tours and Harvey John Charnock, which was heard for directions.

The court faced the task of determining the appropriate legal procedures and next steps for both the criminal and civil cases. For the criminal case, the court needed to consider the evidence presented and apply relevant criminal law principles to make a decision. In the civil case, the focus was on guiding the parties through the procedural aspects of the litigation and ensuring that the case progressed appropriately. The reasoning and outcome of these cases involved a detailed analysis of the presented evidence, application of legal standards, and consideration of the specific circumstances of each party involved.

The court's decisions were made based on the merits of each case, with careful consideration of the legal principles and the facts presented. The outcome included directions for the civil case and a decision in the criminal matter. Further orders were made as necessary to ensure the proper conduct of the proceedings and the fair resolution of the disputes.

The final orders of the court included specific directions for the parties involved in the civil case, as well as a definitive decision in the criminal matter. The court ensured that all procedural aspects were addressed and that the rights of the parties were protected throughout the process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.