Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 16 March 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 16 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males

For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

DFP
(Part-Heard)

For Bail Consent
Stephanie Louise Hay

For Mention
Brett James Hannan

For Directions Hearing

For Directions Hearing via video link
Stephen John Williams

10:15 a.m.
For Plea

ACJ

3.30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Zack David Devine

4.15 p.m.
For Bail Application and Directions Hearing
John Gilbert Timbs

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BPJ

For Sentence
Paul Raymond Doyle

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Daniel Cure
Matthew Davey
David Eaton

1:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Tyson Jack Montgomery

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
and Risdon Prison Complex
NHJR

For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
and Risdon Prison Complex
Mark Carr

(Part Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited
as personal representative of the
Estate of the late Dorothea Smith
v

Karina Skegg and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Directions Hearing by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
and Risdon Prison Complex
NHJR

To Follow
For Bail Application (Part Heard) by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
and Risdon Prison Complex
Mark Carr

9:45am For Mention
Joshua Michael Brown
James Peter Sampson

10:00am For Directions by Video Link
Toby John Della Valle

To Follow
For Remand by Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ivan James Quarrell

To Follow
For Remand
Cody James Lee

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Samual Clinton Wilmot

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Edward Albert Henley

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Scott Davidson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Angela Marie McKenna
v

Andrew Freeman and anor

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various cases on the 16th of March 2018. Among the cases was Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, which was heard in civil jurisdiction. The dispute between the two companies pertained to a contract for the supply of electricity. The court was required to decide on the contractual obligations of both parties and whether there was a breach of contract.

The court heard arguments from both parties and considered the evidence presented. The court found that there was a breach of contract by the defendant, Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The defendant had failed to provide the contracted services, which resulted in financial losses for the plaintiff. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff, Brocklands Pty Ltd.

The court's decision was based on the contractual obligations of both parties and the evidence presented. The court found that the defendant had breached the contract by failing to provide the services as agreed. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff for the losses incurred due to the breach of contract.

The court ordered the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff in the amount of $125,000, along with interest and costs. The court also ordered that the judgment be registered in the Land Titles Office. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations and the consequences of failing to do so.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 16 March 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established