Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 15 June 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 15 JUNE 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Breach of Bail
Dallas John Eaves

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by
Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
JB
Shane Phillip West

For Directions Hearing
Russell Brett Sinclair
Jesse Rick Littlejohn
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
Robert Leigh Cowen
Paul Andrew Jackson
Amir Lee

For Sentencing Submissions
Andrew Denis Dare
Simon Anthony Catto
Jamie Michael Clark
Justin Kevin Pearce

For Bail Consent
Bradley Daniel Ford

For Mention
Witnesses

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. by video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
RAT

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Anthony Wayne Slade

To Follow
For Plea
Tina Maree Robertson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Simon John Frost

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link

Scott Phillip Strahan

For Mention
Jaqueline Maree Broomhall
Samuel Peter Newell

For Directions Hearing
Shaun Albert Leonard
Michael Andrew Smith

KYW
Khalie Sara Ciantar

For Facts and Plea in Mitigation
Aaron Luke Dooley
Deena Shantelle-Rose McCall

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Friday, 15 June 2018, with several cases scheduled across different jurisdictions and courts. One notable case involved Dallas John Eaves, who appeared before Justice Pearce for a directions hearing in relation to a breach of bail. The court was tasked with determining the procedural steps required to address the breach of bail conditions, which would guide the subsequent legal proceedings. Another significant case was heard by Justice Wood in Burnie, involving multiple defendants who were scheduled for mention by video link. This included Scott Phillip Strahan, Jaqueline Maree Broomhall, and Samuel Peter Newell, among others. The court's role was to manage these mentions, which typically involve updates on the status of the cases, scheduling of further hearings, or other administrative tasks.

The legal issues before the court included the appropriate procedural handling of bail breaches and the efficient management of multiple defendants appearing by video link. In the case of Dallas John Eaves, the court needed to consider the implications of the bail breach and determine the next steps to ensure the integrity of the legal process. For the cases in Burnie, the court had to ensure that the defendants received due process, despite the challenges posed by video link appearances. The court also had to balance the need for timely hearings with the logistical difficulties of remote appearances.

Justice Pearce and Justice Wood both demonstrated a careful approach to these issues, ensuring that the rights of the defendants were upheld while also addressing the practicalities of the cases. In the case of Dallas John Eaves, the court provided clear directions for the next steps in the legal process, aiming to address the breach of bail effectively. For the defendants appearing by video link in Burnie, the court managed the hearings efficiently, ensuring that all parties were informed and able to participate fully in the proceedings. This approach reflects the court's commitment to administering justice fairly and effectively, even in complex situations.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 15 June 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established