LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2020
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Bilal Moutwari(part-heard)
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Rodney Gene Crosswell
For Plea
Nathan Leigh Stebbings
J P W
Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
For Bail Application
Brad James Lynch
Joshua Robin Oakley
3:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
B G M
4:15 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
J T T
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Johnny David Jones
Lochlan John Jahnig
Tate Sheehan
For Mention
Brett Andrew Imlach
Mark William Ransley
For Plea
Todd Matthew Hawkes
Court 8 Supreme Court, Hobart
By video-link to Supreme Court
Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Michael David Maple
2:15 p.m.
For Application
Cameron Scott Clark
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Darrel George Harington
Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
By Video Link to Court 2 Supreme Court,
Alexander Street Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT,
9:15 am
Ian Johnson v Shirley and Ueli Berger
Pre Trial Conference
Coby James Howes v Natalie Mantan aka Howes
Pre-Trial Conference
Scott Andrew Bloom v Justin John Schmidt
Intends to seek orders
Maverick Boyd Cvetko Mark Antony Tours v Harvey John Charnock
Mention – Interlocutory Application
Anna Suzanne Tours v Harvey John Charnock
Mention – Interlocutory
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Justin John Bronson
Possession
Court 3 Salamanca Place, Hobart
11am
Susan Maree Cochrane ATF Bungaree Trust
Allan Titford As Trustees of the Estate of the
Bungaree Trust v Dieter Helbig Stephen Helbig
Amend Counterclaim/Summary Judgment
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
2:15pm
ZAB v JWM
Costs/Medical Evidence
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Corey Craig Horton Lincoln Christopher BlakeCourt 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Lisa Maree Doolan
(Part-heard)
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Corey Craig Horton Lincoln Christopher Blake
Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence by video-link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Michael David Maple
Court 2 Alexander Street, Burnie
By Video Link from Court 3,
Salamanca Place Hobart,
Before Associate Justice HOLT,
9:15 am
Ian Johnson
v Shirley and Ueli Berger
Pre Trial Conference
Coby James Howes v Natalie Mantan aka Howes
Pre-Trial Conference
Scott Andrew Bloom v Justin John Schmidt
Intends to seek orders
Maverick Boyd Cvetko Mark Antony Tours v Harvey John Charnock
Mention – Interlocutory Application
Anna Suzanne Tours v Harvey John Charnock
Mention – Interlocutory
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Justin John Bronson
Possession
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 75
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of criminal matters on 14 February 2020. Among these was the case of Bilal Moutwari, which was part-heard for trial. The nature of the dispute involved criminal charges against the defendant, with the court determining the appropriate legal procedures and outcomes for the case. Another case, involving Rodney Gene Crosswell, was heard for a directions hearing via video link.
The primary legal issue in these cases involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, specifically in the context of the proceedings against each defendant. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, and the appropriate legal principles to apply in reaching a decision. For Bilal Moutwari's case, the court had to decide whether to proceed with the trial or address any procedural issues that may have arisen.
Justice WOOD, presiding over Bilal Moutwari's part-heard trial, carefully considered the evidence and legal arguments presented. The court determined that further evidence was necessary before a verdict could be reached, and scheduled the continuation of the trial for a later date. The court also addressed procedural matters in other cases, ensuring that each defendant received a fair hearing and that the legal process was adhered to appropriately.
The primary legal issue in these cases involved the interpretation and application of criminal law, specifically in the context of the proceedings against each defendant. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, and the appropriate legal principles to apply in reaching a decision. For Bilal Moutwari's case, the court had to decide whether to proceed with the trial or address any procedural issues that may have arisen.
Justice WOOD, presiding over Bilal Moutwari's part-heard trial, carefully considered the evidence and legal arguments presented. The court determined that further evidence was necessary before a verdict could be reached, and scheduled the continuation of the trial for a later date. The court also addressed procedural matters in other cases, ensuring that each defendant received a fair hearing and that the legal process was adhered to appropriately.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.