Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 12 May 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 109


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 12 MAY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
Hayley Margaret Webster
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention / Directions Hearing
Duncan Francis Cook

IRF    
John Anthony Curtis
Jamie Paul Wilmot
Michael Paul Stewart
Paul Hutchinson
Zachary Dillon Wright
Robert Alexander Hall
Stephen John Williams
Karyn Louise Ford
Darren Paul Clark
Brody Lincoln French

For Bail Consent
Gail Schupp

For Plea
Kerry Leigh Large
RIB    
Kyam Keith Broadby
Brenton Roy Gourlay
Adrian Raymond Nattey

For Facts and Sentence
Glen Anthony Pearton
Michael Andrew Woodward
Darren John Slattery

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Trent Aaron Gordon

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Bradan Sabastian James Stone

For Trial
Zach James Muir-Bennett
Jie Laurence Rainbird
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Application for Breach of Suspended Sentence

Justin Kevin Pearce

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction

11:30 a.m.

For Directions Hearing
Josephine Ramos Cooper
v
Klaus-Dieter Neubert

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
Anthony Colin Finnegan

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shane Mark Ivey
Shadi Farhat

2:15pm For Remand via video link
To Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew Luke Williams

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Caine Robert Richardson
Sean Gregory Richardson
Christopher John Humphreys
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Carly Ann Dekkers

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brady Christopher Oates
(Part-Heard)

2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Darren Ward Gale

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 12 May 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 109
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 109
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, several cases were scheduled for hearing on Friday, 12 May 2017. Notable among them was a bail application for a defendant in a criminal trial, and a directions hearing in a civil matter. The court proceedings were set to take place in various locations including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Chief Justice Blow presided over a criminal trial in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart, where a defendant was facing charges. Justice Tennent was also scheduled to hear a case in the same court, which involved a sentencing matter and a trial.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal proceedings, including trials, sentencing, and bail applications. The court had to consider the appropriate legal standards and precedents to ensure that justice was served in each case. In the civil jurisdiction, a directions hearing was listed before Associate Justice Holt, indicating that the court would address procedural issues and provide guidance on the next steps in a civil matter. These cases highlighted the broad spectrum of legal matters that the Supreme Court of Tasmania handles, from criminal offences to civil disputes.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case would be determined based on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. The judges would consider the evidence, applicable laws, and legal principles to reach a decision that was fair and just. The final orders would be communicated to the parties involved, outlining the court's decisions and any further actions required. This approach ensures that the legal process is transparent and that all parties understand the court's rationale.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.