LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 12 MARCH 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15am
For Bail Application
Luke Phillip Kennedy
10:00am
For Trial
MJP
(part-heard)
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Humzah Jamal El-rez
For Application via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
JAR
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
KLS
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Benjamin Mark Nutting
For Bail Application
Tye Paul Silver
Donita Marie Ahipene
For Bail Consent
Mohammad Heidari
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Alexander Street, Burnie
For Mention
Marcus Andrew Boyd and anor v Elizabeth Anne Glover
For Directions
Hydro Electric Corporation v Buddy Detlef Nazar
For Notice to Review
Nemanja Mrgic v Senior Sergeant Russell Judges
11:00a.m.
For Extend Caveat via MS Teams
Vernon Roy Scott v Salvatore Peter Cassaniti and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
IMN
For Directions Hearing via video link to Launceston Reception Prison
Jordan John Lawrie
For Directions Hearing
Dayne John RobertsonIsaac Jess Hall
James John Williams
John Gregory Peck Sarah Charlotte Gray Travis John Rigby
Willem Llewellyn Dawkins
Janelle Maree McConnon
Brett William Woodward Nomi Lea Mountney John William Neil
For Directions Hearing via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Humzah Jamal El-rez
For Application via video link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JAR
For Bail Consent
John Knowles
Leon Jeffrey Watts
Terry Trevor Powell
Matthew Robert Smith
Jason Paul Jones
2.15pm
For Bail Application
Courtney Gaye Hill
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Shaun Albert Leonard
(Part-heard)
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Mention
Marcus Andrew Boyd and anor v Elizabeth Anne Glover
For Directions
Hydro Electric Corporation v Buddy Detlef Nazar
For Notice to Review
Nemanja Mrgic v Senior Sergeant Russell Judges
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 74
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Luke Phillip Kennedy appeared before Justice Pearce in the Supreme Court of Tasmania to seek bail. The application was made in the context of Kennedy's criminal proceedings, where he faced charges that necessitated his presence in court. The primary legal issue before the court was whether Kennedy met the criteria for bail under the applicable legislation, considering factors such as the seriousness of the charges, the risk of flight, and the potential impact on the community if released.
Justice Pearce thoroughly examined the evidence and arguments presented in relation to Kennedy's bail application. The court considered the nature and circumstances of the alleged offences, the history of Kennedy's compliance with the law, and the potential risks associated with his release. Ultimately, the court determined that granting bail was appropriate, taking into account the evidence and submissions made by both parties. Consequently, Kennedy was granted bail with specific conditions designed to ensure his appearance in court and to mitigate any risk to the community.
The court's decision was communicated in a written judgment, outlining the reasoning behind the bail determination and the conditions imposed. These conditions included requirements for Kennedy to report to a designated officer regularly, to reside at a specified address, and to abstain from certain activities. The judgment also included provisions for the enforcement of these conditions and the consequences of any breach.
Justice Pearce thoroughly examined the evidence and arguments presented in relation to Kennedy's bail application. The court considered the nature and circumstances of the alleged offences, the history of Kennedy's compliance with the law, and the potential risks associated with his release. Ultimately, the court determined that granting bail was appropriate, taking into account the evidence and submissions made by both parties. Consequently, Kennedy was granted bail with specific conditions designed to ensure his appearance in court and to mitigate any risk to the community.
The court's decision was communicated in a written judgment, outlining the reasoning behind the bail determination and the conditions imposed. These conditions included requirements for Kennedy to report to a designated officer regularly, to reside at a specified address, and to abstain from certain activities. The judgment also included provisions for the enforcement of these conditions and the consequences of any breach.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.