LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 11 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Paul Wayne Simpson
For Directions Hearing
MDR
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Justin Cleaver
For Trial
Robert Michael Allen
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
For Directions Hearing
Zeb Haas
Shannon Myree Arnold
Emma May Wordsworth
Casey Therese Howlett
For Bail Consent
Joel James Lorkin
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
RDA
Ricky Damien Brown
Jamie Michael Clark
For Sentence
Christopher Kenneth Cook
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Richard Francis Clarke
Jason Samuel McCormick
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Bryden Homes Pty Ltd
v
Tasbuild Limited
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45am For Mention
Clinton Charles Wilson
To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
KPM
10:00am For Bail Consent
Jason Graham Thomas
To Follow
For Trial
Harley James Wilmot
4:00pm For Sentence
CH
Robert Oswen Tyler
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 11 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 403
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 403
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of contractual terms, the identification of any breaches of contract, and the assessment of damages, if any, resulting from those breaches. The plaintiff, Bryden Homes, argued that Tasbuild had failed to deliver the property in a fit and proper condition as per the contract terms. Conversely, Tasbuild contended that any issues were either not their responsibility or were within the allowable tolerances stipulated in the contract.
Justice Wood examined the contractual documents and the evidence presented by both parties. The court found that Tasbuild had indeed breached several clauses of the contract by failing to meet the specified standards of workmanship. The defects identified were not minor and significantly impacted the usability and safety of the property. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of Bryden Homes, awarding damages for the breach of contract and ordered Tasbuild to rectify the defects at their expense.
The final orders of the court included the awarding of damages to Bryden Homes for the cost of rectification of the defects, additional costs incurred due to the delays, and a sum for the diminution in value of the property. Tasbuild was also directed to complete the necessary repairs within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.