Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 1 March 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 38


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 1 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ashton Mitchell Gill
Cody David Brown
Alan Kenneth King

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Robert George Greig
Zack David Devine
Jye David Cowen
Craig Raymond Silva

For Directions Hearing via video link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security
Chris Byers Rossi

For Directions Hearing via video link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Kylie Jane Hack

For Directions Hearing to Hobart Reception Prison
Anthony Paul Smith

For Directions Hearing
Bal Bahadur Poudel
Gary Matthews
Jessica Gay Schreiweis
RUB  
Christopher Robert Condon
Johnny David Jones
Rapinder Singh
Gloria Angele Kennedy
Amanda Louise White
Brendan David Cranston
Nathanial Hendrik Brouwer
MWR  
Rebecca Jayne Eirth
Blain David Moate
Erica Helen Bennett

For Sentence
Alessandro Roberto Meloni-Young

For Sentencing Submissions
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

For Bail Consent
David William Michaelson
JSP  
AGD                      
ALS  
Terrence Michael Howe
Jarod Andrew Huxley
ADES  
Bradley Daniel Ford
Alexander Brett White
Dean Phillip Braslin
James Matthew Johnson
DTN   
James Stuart Walker
Jamian Osbourne Burden

11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
John Keith Mogford

Andrew David Thompson

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Satchithananthan Chelliah
v
Anthony Di Benedetto & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30am For Hearing
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Carl Hippman & Ors.

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 1 March 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 38
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 38
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several criminal and civil matters on 1 March 2019. In Court 7 at 9:15 a.m., Justice Wood presided over a trial involving Matthew John Davey, David John Eaton, and Daniel Cure. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document. Other hearings and mentions involved various criminal cases, including directions hearings and bail applications for defendants held in different prisons and detention centres.

The legal issues before the court included the trial of defendants in Court 7, as well as various procedural matters related to criminal cases, such as directions hearings and bail applications. Justice Wood would have needed to consider the evidence presented and the applicable laws to reach a decision in the trial. For the other matters, the court would have needed to address issues such as the setting of trial dates, the granting or refusal of bail, and other procedural matters related to the criminal cases.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each matter would have been determined based on the specific circumstances of each case. For the trial in Court 7, Justice Wood would have considered the evidence presented and the applicable laws to reach a decision. For the other matters, the court would have addressed the procedural issues raised and made decisions based on the merits of each case. The final orders for each matter would have been determined by the court and recorded in the court's records.

If the case involved any civil matters, the court would have considered the legal issues raised by the parties and made a decision based on the evidence and applicable laws. The outcome of the case would have been determined by the court and recorded in the court's records. The final orders for the case would have been made by the court and recorded in the court's records.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.