Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Tuesday, 3 October 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 224


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR TUESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Shaun Robert Armstrong
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Christopher Roy Butt
v
The State of Tasmania

For Bail Application
Justin Cleaver
Robert Alexander Hall 

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
2:15 p.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd ACN 167 357 299

In Chambers
3:00 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
In the matter of the Legal Profession Act 2007 and in the matter of an application by Arthur Sideris

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

3:30 p.m.
For Application via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Peter Francis Thomas Brooks
v
Barry Maxwell Easther, Norma Lynn Mason and The Acting Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video-Link 
Bevan John Gleeson
David Mark Delphine

To Follow
For Mention
Jessica Maree Everett
Carl Hordvik Hume

To Follow
For Plea
Andrew Hodgetts
Michael James Sulzberger

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Jack Dale

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
3:30pm For Application via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Peter Francis Thomas Brooks v Barry Maxwell Easther, Norma Lynn Mason and The Acting Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania

Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15pm For Sentencing Submissions
Dane Lindon Squires

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Tuesday, 3 October 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 224
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 224
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings on Tuesday, 3 October 2017. Shaun Robert Armstrong brought a case against the State of Tasmania before Justice ESTCOURT in the Court of Criminal Appeal. The nature of the dispute involved criminal proceedings, but the specifics were not detailed in the court list. Another case involved Christopher Roy Butt who sought bail before Justice BLOW.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed questions of criminal appeal, bail application, and procedural directions in civil matters. The Court of Criminal Appeal had to consider the merits of Armstrong's appeal against a decision made in a lower court. The bail application raised issues regarding the conditions under which Butt could be released pending trial. Additionally, the procedural directions hearings addressed the management and scheduling of ongoing civil cases, including Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd ACN 167 357 299.

The reasoning and outcome of these hearings were not detailed in the court list. However, the hearings involved judicial oversight and decision-making on matters such as criminal appeals, bail applications, and the management of civil proceedings. Each case required the court to apply relevant legal principles and statutes to reach decisions that would either advance or conclude the respective legal matters.

The final orders from these hearings would have been communicated directly to the parties involved, detailing the outcomes and any further steps required in their respective cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.