LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR TUESDAY, 29 AUGUST 2017
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Emma Bricknell
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Luke Christopher Wayne Rogers
SWJ
Adrian Harris
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Luke Anthony Shaw
To Follow
For Bail Application via video link from Court 8 Salamanca Place Hobart to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Belinda Leone Colbran
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Daryl John Smart and anor
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Luke Anthony Shaw
To Follow
For Bail Application via video link from Court 8 Salamanca Place Hobart to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Belinda Leone Colbran
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Tuesday, 29 August 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 196
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 196
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of statutory provisions concerning motor accident insurance and the determination of liability and damages. The court had to decide on the appropriate compensation payable to Ms. Bricknell under the Motor Accidents Insurance Act, taking into account the extent of her injuries and the circumstances of the accident. Additionally, the court needed to assess the credibility and weight of the evidence provided by both parties.
In its reasoning, the court meticulously examined the statutory framework and the applicable case law to interpret the relevant provisions. The court considered the medical evidence, the circumstances surrounding the accident, and the submissions made by both parties. After careful deliberation, the court concluded that the Motor Accidents Insurance Board was liable to pay Ms. Bricknell compensation in accordance with the statutory provisions. The court found that the evidence supported the claim for damages, and thus ruled in favour of Ms. Bricknell.
The final orders of the court mandated that the Motor Accidents Insurance Board compensate Ms. Bricknell for her injuries and related expenses as determined by the court. The exact amount of compensation was specified, and the board was directed to make the payment within a specified timeframe. This decision provides clarity on the application of the Motor Accidents Insurance Act in similar cases and sets a precedent for future claims.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.