LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR THURSDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 2017
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Danny Leigh Morgan
Stephanie Louise Hay
For Trial
Casey Richard Cowen
Leigh Reginald Dobson
A Witness
A Witness
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Stuart Norton Woods
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Edwina Jane Millington (also known as Edwina Jane Gelston)
v
Reid Michael Daniels
(Part-Heard)
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Lee-Anne Marie Levett
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
10:00 a.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Peta Leanne Britton
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
Set Aside Costs/Amend Proceedings
Anthony Smith
v
Worrall Lawyers
2:15 p.m.
Set Aside Third Party Notice
Sean Dicker
v
Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application
Zoe Leanne Whiley
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Alexander Collins
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Sarah Lauren Martin
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Thursday, 21 September 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 215
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address involved the interpretation and application of civil law to the facts and arguments presented by both parties. The court had to consider the evidence and submissions made during the part-heard trial to determine the appropriate legal outcomes and rulings.
The court's reasoning and outcome were based on a thorough examination of the presented evidence and legal arguments. Acting Justice Slicer provided a detailed analysis of the case, taking into account the relevant laws and precedents. The final decision and any necessary orders were communicated to the parties involved, concluding the part-heard trial.
No specific final orders were mentioned in the text, but it is expected that the court would provide appropriate rulings and directions based on its decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.