Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania For Thursday, 19 October 2017 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR THURSDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Paul Joseph Newman

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:15 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher John Worker
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Plea in Mitigation via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

MAC

Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
For Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Andrew Gray
v
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

MDR

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Motion to Review
Constable Debra Harriss v Alex Williams-Coates

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Motion to Review
James Andrew Cuthbert
v
Daryl Coates SC

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice SLICER

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Kurt Stanley Arnol

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15pm For Plea in Mitigation via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MAC

Civil Jurisdiction
3.30pm For Hearing via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Andrew Gray
v
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice Pearce

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Adam James Partridge

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Adam Chris Onions
Danny Richard Jago

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MDR

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of criminal and civil cases on Thursday, 19 October 2017. In the criminal jurisdiction, Paul Joseph Newman appeared for sentencing, while Christopher John Worker faced a part-heard trial. The court also heard a plea in mitigation for Andrew Gray via video link from Launceston, as well as a mention for MDR via video link from Burnie. In the civil jurisdiction, there was a motion to review in the case of Constable Debra Harriss v Alex Williams-Coates, and another in the case of James Andrew Cuthbert v Daryl Coates SC.

The legal issues in these cases varied widely, with some involving sentencing, others trial proceedings, and others still motions to review. The court had to consider the appropriate sentences for Newman, the progress of the trial for Worker, and the mitigating circumstances for Gray. In the civil cases, the court had to assess the merits of the motions to review and determine whether they should be granted.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not provided in the document. The court would have considered the evidence, arguments, and applicable laws in each case to reach its decisions. The outcomes could have included sentencing orders, trial directions, or decisions on the motions to review. The final orders would have been communicated to the parties involved.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania handled a range of criminal and civil cases on 19 October 2017, with issues spanning sentencing, trial proceedings, and motions to review. The court's decisions would have been based on the specific facts and legal principles applicable to each case.

Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania For Thursday, 19 October 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established