Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Monday, 28 August 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 195


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR MONDAY, 28 AUGUST 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Mary Brownell
v
Christine Robinson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Westpac Banking Corporation
v
Jillian Saltmarsh and anor

Michael Saltmarsh and anor
v
Westpac Banking Corporation

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Monday, 28 August 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 195
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 195
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mary Brownell commenced proceedings against Christine Robinson in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute is not specified in the provided text. Christine Robinson responded to the proceedings, and the matter was listed for hearing before the full court. The second case listed involves Westpac Banking Corporation and Jillian Saltmarsh, with Michael Saltmarsh and an additional respondent also named. The nature of this dispute is not detailed in the text. This case was also scheduled for hearing before the court. No cases were listed for Launceston or Burnie.

The legal issues that the court would need to address in the Brownell v Robinson case are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, typically such cases might involve questions of liability, damages, or contractual obligations. In the Westpac Banking Corporation v Jillian Saltmarsh case, the court might need to consider issues such as the validity of the loan agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties under the agreement, and any defences raised by the respondents.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases are not provided in the text. The court would have heard arguments from both parties, examined evidence, and applied relevant legal principles to reach a decision. The final orders would detail the court's decision on the issues and any remedies awarded. Given the nature of the disputes and the fact that they are listed for hearing, it is likely that the court would provide detailed judgments explaining the legal basis for its decisions.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear two cases on the specified date. The first case involves Mary Brownell and Christine Robinson, while the second involves Westpac Banking Corporation and Jillian Saltmarsh, with additional respondents. The specific legal issues and outcomes are not provided in the text, but the court would have applied relevant legal principles to reach a decision. The final orders would detail the court's judgment and any remedies awarded.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.