Latner and Simmel
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 972
•17 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Latner and Simmel [2019] FamCA 972
[2019] FamCA 972
17 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of *Latner and Simmel* concerned parenting orders made by Hannam J in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The dispute involved the mother and father of a child, X, regarding arrangements for X's care and time spent with each parent.
The court was required to determine the terms of parenting orders that would best serve the interests of the child, X. This involved establishing principles of parental responsibility, determining with whom X would live, and detailing the specific arrangements for X's time with each parent, including during school terms, holidays, and special occasions. The court also had to address practical considerations such as communication between parents, travel arrangements, and the involvement of external programs and professional costs.
Hannam J made orders reflecting equal and shared parental responsibility for X. X was ordered to live with her mother, with the father to have defined periods of time with X, which were to progressively increase and become more detailed over time. The orders stipulated specific arrangements for X's time with her father, including pick-up and drop-off protocols, requirements for overnight stays, and limitations on taking X outside of Sydney. The court also included provisions for communication between parents regarding X's health and any changes in living arrangements, as well as the requirement for both parents to participate in a "Keeping Contact" program.
The father was ordered to pay a contribution towards the Independent Children's Lawyer's professional costs.
The court was required to determine the terms of parenting orders that would best serve the interests of the child, X. This involved establishing principles of parental responsibility, determining with whom X would live, and detailing the specific arrangements for X's time with each parent, including during school terms, holidays, and special occasions. The court also had to address practical considerations such as communication between parents, travel arrangements, and the involvement of external programs and professional costs.
Hannam J made orders reflecting equal and shared parental responsibility for X. X was ordered to live with her mother, with the father to have defined periods of time with X, which were to progressively increase and become more detailed over time. The orders stipulated specific arrangements for X's time with her father, including pick-up and drop-off protocols, requirements for overnight stays, and limitations on taking X outside of Sydney. The court also included provisions for communication between parents regarding X's health and any changes in living arrangements, as well as the requirement for both parents to participate in a "Keeping Contact" program.
The father was ordered to pay a contribution towards the Independent Children's Lawyer's professional costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Latner and Simmel [2019] FamCA 972
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
2
Deiter & Deiter
[2011] FamCAFC 82
M v M
[1988] HCA 68
M v M
[1988] HCA 68