Larter v Hazzard
Case
•
[2022] NSWCA 238
•22 November 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Larter v Hazzard [2022] NSWCA 238
[2022] NSWCA 238
22 November 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Larter v Hazzard*, the applicant, a healthcare worker employed by the state, challenged public health orders made under section 7 of the *Public Health Act 2010* (NSW). These orders mandated vaccination for state-employed healthcare workers by specific dates. The applicant contended that the Minister lacked the authority to make these orders, questioning their validity in light of public health risks, their duration exceeding statutory limits, and their alleged inconsistency with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The matter was heard by Brereton and Mitchelmore JJA.
The central legal issues before the court were whether the Minister acted within their powers in issuing the vaccination mandates, particularly concerning the assessment of public health risks. The court was also required to determine if the orders could lawfully extend beyond the 90-day limit prescribed by the *Public Health Act 2010* (NSW), and whether the mandates were incompatible with the rights protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Court of Appeal granted the applicant an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal, backdated to the filing of the summons. However, the Court ultimately refused leave to appeal and ordered the applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The central legal issues before the court were whether the Minister acted within their powers in issuing the vaccination mandates, particularly concerning the assessment of public health risks. The court was also required to determine if the orders could lawfully extend beyond the 90-day limit prescribed by the *Public Health Act 2010* (NSW), and whether the mandates were incompatible with the rights protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Court of Appeal granted the applicant an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal, backdated to the filing of the summons. However, the Court ultimately refused leave to appeal and ordered the applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Employment Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Larter v Hazzard [2022] NSWCA 238
Most Recent Citation
E1 v E2; E Pty Limited v E2 [2023] NSWDC 411
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
8
Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard
[2021] NSWCA 299
Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard
[2021] NSWCA 299
Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard
[2021] NSWCA 299