LAO & CXUE
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 247
•27 February 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
LAO & CXUE [2015] FamCA 247
[2015] FamCA 247
27 February 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of LAO & CXUE, heard before Cronin J, the dispute concerned financial matters between a husband and wife. The wife had filed an application in a case on 1 October 2014, which was ultimately dismissed. The court also made orders regarding costs and the execution of an authority by the husband in favour of his solicitor.
The primary legal issues before the court involved the determination of costs and the husband's entitlement to obtain information from specific financial institutions. This included the basis upon which the wife should pay the husband's costs, and the extent of those costs. Furthermore, the court had to consider the necessity and scope of an authority to be executed by the husband to facilitate the retrieval of documents from banks in Hong Kong and China.
The court ordered that the wife pay the husband's costs on an indemnity basis, specifying an amount of $5340 and further costs related to an affidavit and correspondence during a particular period. The husband was also ordered to execute an authority in favour of his solicitor, directing it to HSBC Bank in Hong Kong, China Citic Bank International Limited in Hong Kong, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in China. The costs associated with communicating with these banks and obtaining documents were to be met from funds held in trust by the husband's solicitors. The wife's application filed on 1 October 2014 was otherwise dismissed.
The primary legal issues before the court involved the determination of costs and the husband's entitlement to obtain information from specific financial institutions. This included the basis upon which the wife should pay the husband's costs, and the extent of those costs. Furthermore, the court had to consider the necessity and scope of an authority to be executed by the husband to facilitate the retrieval of documents from banks in Hong Kong and China.
The court ordered that the wife pay the husband's costs on an indemnity basis, specifying an amount of $5340 and further costs related to an affidavit and correspondence during a particular period. The husband was also ordered to execute an authority in favour of his solicitor, directing it to HSBC Bank in Hong Kong, China Citic Bank International Limited in Hong Kong, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in China. The costs associated with communicating with these banks and obtaining documents were to be met from funds held in trust by the husband's solicitors. The wife's application filed on 1 October 2014 was otherwise dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
LAO & CXUE [2015] FamCA 247
Cases Citing This Decision
0