Langbein v Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FCA 1619
•26 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Langbein v Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1619
[2019] FCA 1619
26 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Langbein was the appellant and Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd was the respondent. The case was heard in the High Court of Australia. The appeal was from an earlier judgment in the Federal Court. The appellant sought an extension of the stay of the judgment from which the appeal was made, while the respondent sought security for the costs of the appeal. The appellant had already paid the judgment debt but had not yet received any benefit from the money, and the respondent offered to repay the amount if the appeal was successful. The respondent also argued that the appellant, being a resident outside of Australia and having no assets within Australia, should provide security for the costs of the appeal.
The court dismissed the appellant's application for an extension of the stay of the judgment, noting that the appellant had already received no benefit from the judgment debt payment. The court ordered the appellant to provide security for the respondent's costs of the appeal, as the appellant was a resident outside of Australia and had no assets within Australia. The court ordered the appellant to pay $30,000 as security for the costs of the appeal, to be paid into court within 21 days of the order. The appellant's appeal was stayed until the security for costs was provided.
The court ordered that the costs of the respondent's interlocutory application for security for costs be costs in the appeal. The matter was listed for case management on 24 October 2019 at 9:30am, which was also to be the return day for any application brought by the respondent if security was not established. The court's orders were to be entered in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
The court dismissed the appellant's application for an extension of the stay of the judgment, noting that the appellant had already received no benefit from the judgment debt payment. The court ordered the appellant to provide security for the respondent's costs of the appeal, as the appellant was a resident outside of Australia and had no assets within Australia. The court ordered the appellant to pay $30,000 as security for the costs of the appeal, to be paid into court within 21 days of the order. The appellant's appeal was stayed until the security for costs was provided.
The court ordered that the costs of the respondent's interlocutory application for security for costs be costs in the appeal. The matter was listed for case management on 24 October 2019 at 9:30am, which was also to be the return day for any application brought by the respondent if security was not established. The court's orders were to be entered in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Costs
-
Security for Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Langbein v Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 188
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd v Aircraft Support Industries Engineering Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) and Ors (No.2)
[2019] FCCA 3690
Langbein v Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2020] FCA 188
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
Ekes v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited
[2011] FCA 230
KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd
[1995] FCA 76
PS Chellaram & Co Ltd v China Ocean Shipping Co
[1991] HCA 36