Landy and Pace
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 1681
•6 July 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Landy and Pace [2018] FCCA 1681
[2018] FCCA 1681
6 July 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Landy and Pace, Judge Neville of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia was required to make orders concerning the division of property between the parties. The dispute centred on the disposition of a property known as Property A, with the court ultimately ordering its sale and the division of the net proceeds.
The court was tasked with determining the terms of the property settlement, including the valuation and sale process for Property A, the allocation of sale costs, and the distribution of the net proceeds between the parties. Further issues included the division of other assets and liabilities, and the mechanism for enforcing the court's orders.
Judge Neville ordered that the respondent pay the applicant a sum representing 54% of the agreed value of Property A within 30 days. If this payment was not made, the property was to be placed on the market for sale by auction. The respondent was required to remove his belongings from the property within 14 days, and if he failed to do so, he would be restrained from attending the property and a trustee for sale would be appointed. The court also stipulated the process for selecting a real estate agent, the preparation of the property for sale, the division of advertising and auctioneer costs, and a reserve price for the auction. Upon sale, after costs, the net proceeds were to be divided with 54% to the applicant and 46% to the respondent. The orders also addressed the division of other property and liabilities, with each party retaining possession of their respective assets and being solely liable for associated debts. The Registrar of the Federal Circuit Court was appointed to execute documents if either party refused to do so.
The court was tasked with determining the terms of the property settlement, including the valuation and sale process for Property A, the allocation of sale costs, and the distribution of the net proceeds between the parties. Further issues included the division of other assets and liabilities, and the mechanism for enforcing the court's orders.
Judge Neville ordered that the respondent pay the applicant a sum representing 54% of the agreed value of Property A within 30 days. If this payment was not made, the property was to be placed on the market for sale by auction. The respondent was required to remove his belongings from the property within 14 days, and if he failed to do so, he would be restrained from attending the property and a trustee for sale would be appointed. The court also stipulated the process for selecting a real estate agent, the preparation of the property for sale, the division of advertising and auctioneer costs, and a reserve price for the auction. Upon sale, after costs, the net proceeds were to be divided with 54% to the applicant and 46% to the respondent. The orders also addressed the division of other property and liabilities, with each party retaining possession of their respective assets and being solely liable for associated debts. The Registrar of the Federal Circuit Court was appointed to execute documents if either party refused to do so.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Landy and Pace [2018] FCCA 1681
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
3
Vass & Vass
[2015] FamCAFC 51
Harper & Harper
[2013] FamCA 528
Bonacci & Bonacci
[2012] FamCAFC 15