Land and Resources Tribunal v Schmidt
Case
•
[2005] QCA 195
•10 June 2005
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Land and Resources Tribunal v Schmidt [2005] QCA 195
[2005] QCA 195
10 June 2005
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Land and Resources Tribunal v Schmidt, the Tribunal was the applicant and sought to challenge the jurisdiction of the President of the Tribunal, who had determined an application under section 281 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld). The respondent, Schmidt, had filed a notice of appeal with the Tribunal pursuant to section 282, raising questions of fact and law. The primary legal issues for the court were whether section 282 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld) provided for an appeal from the determination of the President to the Tribunal and whether section 67 of the Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999 (Qld) provided for an appeal from the determination of the President to the Court of Appeal.
The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and found that section 282 did not provide for an appeal from the determination of the President to the Tribunal. Instead, the court held that appeals from the President’s decisions were to be made directly to the Court of Appeal. The court also considered whether the President had the power to order that a question of law be referred to the Court of Appeal under section 70(2) of the Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999 (Qld). The court concluded that the President did not have such power, and the proper procedure for referring a question of law was through an originating application filed by the Tribunal.
The court dismissed the originating application and ordered that the Tribunal pay the costs of the first respondent in the originating application, which was to be assessed. The court made no order as to the second respondent’s costs of the originating application. This decision clarified the appeal process within the Land and Resources Tribunal and reinforced the appropriate procedures for referring questions of law to the Court of Appeal.
The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and found that section 282 did not provide for an appeal from the determination of the President to the Tribunal. Instead, the court held that appeals from the President’s decisions were to be made directly to the Court of Appeal. The court also considered whether the President had the power to order that a question of law be referred to the Court of Appeal under section 70(2) of the Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999 (Qld). The court concluded that the President did not have such power, and the proper procedure for referring a question of law was through an originating application filed by the Tribunal.
The court dismissed the originating application and ordered that the Tribunal pay the costs of the first respondent in the originating application, which was to be assessed. The court made no order as to the second respondent’s costs of the originating application. This decision clarified the appeal process within the Land and Resources Tribunal and reinforced the appropriate procedures for referring questions of law to the Court of Appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Mineral Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Case stated by a magistrate at Brisbane [2017] QDC 48
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Gregcarbil Pty Ltd v Backus (No. 4)
[2013] QLC 68
Case stated by a magistrate at Brisbane
[2017] QDC 48
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
4