| [2017] FWCA 845 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Laminex Pty Ltd T/A Laminex
(AG2016/7461)
LAMINEX TOWNSVILLE BRANCH AGREEMENT 2016- 2019
Timber and paper products industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 9 FEBRUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Laminex Townsville Branch Agreement 2016- 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Laminex Townsville Branch Agreement 2016- 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Laminex Pty Ltd T/A Laminex. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 February 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 November 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE423307 PR590137>
- AGLC
- Laminex Pty Ltd T/A Laminex [2017] FWCA 845
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 845
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues that the Commission had to resolve were whether the proposed agreement met the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act and whether it was appropriate to approve the agreement given the submissions and evidence presented by the AMWU and Laminex. The AMWU contested the agreement on the grounds that it did not provide adequate protections and benefits for the employees, while Laminex argued that the agreement was fair and necessary to maintain competitiveness and operational efficiency.
The Commission considered the submissions from both parties and the broader context of the industrial relationship. It was determined that the proposed agreement did not adequately address some of the union's concerns, particularly regarding employee entitlements and conditions. However, the Commission also recognised the need for flexibility in certain areas to allow the company to remain competitive. After careful deliberation, the Commission decided that the agreement, while not perfect, was in the best interest of the employees and the employer in the given context. The Commission approved the agreement with some modifications to address the union's key concerns.
The Fair Work Commission's final order was the approval of the Laminex Townsville Branch Agreement for the period 2016 to 2019, subject to the modifications made to address the union's concerns. The modifications were intended to ensure that the agreement better reflected the needs and protections of the employees while still allowing for the necessary operational flexibility for Laminex.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.