[2013] FWCA 6810 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A The Laminex Group
(AG2013/8556)
THE LAMINEX GROUP (COFFS HARBOUR) DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 2013
Timber and paper products industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 10 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of The Laminex Group (Coffs Harbour) Distribution Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The Laminex Group (Coffs Harbour) Distribution Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Multiple Electrical Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 May 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE403929 PR541593>
- AGLC
- Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A The Laminex Group [2013] FWCA 6810
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6810
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the distribution agreement contravened any provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, particularly Part IV, which prohibits anti-competitive conduct. The court had to assess if the agreement contained any exclusive dealing or other provisions that might restrict competition. The court also needed to consider if the agreement was likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition.
The court reviewed the terms of the agreement and the nature of the market in which Laminex operates. It concluded that the agreement did not contain any exclusive dealing provisions and did not restrict competition in any way. The court found that the agreement was designed to ensure efficient distribution and did not have an appreciable adverse effect on competition. Therefore, the court approved the distribution agreement.
The court ordered that the distribution agreement be approved, subject to certain conditions designed to ensure that it continued to operate in a way that was consistent with competition and consumer laws. The court's decision allowed The Laminex Group to proceed with its distribution arrangements in Coffs Harbour, ensuring that the agreement did not hinder fair competition in the market.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.