[2014] FWCA 21 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A Laminex Australia
(AG2013/11887)
LAMINEX DARDANUP PLANT PRODUCTION AGREEMENT 2013
Timber and paper products industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 2 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Laminex Dardanup Plant Production Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Laminex Dardanup Plant Production Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A Laminex Australia. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE406161 PR546402>
- AGLC
- Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A Laminex Australia [2014] FWCA 21
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 21
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether the agreement met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act for a valid agreement. Specifically, the court had to examine whether the agreement was made in good faith and for the purpose of creating a workplace agreement, whether it was made independently, and whether it contained certain prescribed terms. The court also had to determine if the agreement was in the interests of the employees covered by it.
The court found that the Laminex Dardanup Plant Production Agreement 2013 was valid. The decision hinged on the court's interpretation of the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement. The court concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and for the purpose of creating a workplace agreement. It was also found to be made independently and contained the prescribed terms. Furthermore, the court determined that the agreement was in the interests of the employees, considering the benefits provided and the context in which it was negotiated.
The court's decision resulted in the approval of the Laminex Dardanup Plant Production Agreement 2013. The order granted the application for approval, allowing the agreement to proceed as a valid workplace agreement under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.