DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Laminex Group Pty Limited
(AG2016/6340)

LAMINEX LAUNCESTON BRANCH AGREEMENT 2016

Tasmania
COMMISSIONER GREGORY	MELBOURNE, 18 NOVEMBER 2016

Application for approval of the Laminex Launceston Branch Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Laminex Launceston Branch Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Laminex Group Pty Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 November 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Laminex Group Pty Limited applying to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Laminex Launceston Branch Agreement 2016. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically the provisions relating to enterprise agreements. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval, including compliance with procedural fairness and the protection of employees' rights.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was a "single interest" enterprise agreement as defined in the Fair Work Act, whether the proper procedures for negotiating the agreement were followed, and whether the agreement provided adequate protection for employees. The Commission had to consider submissions from both the applicant and various employee representatives to resolve these issues.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was indeed a "single interest" enterprise agreement and that the negotiation process had been conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also concluded that the agreement provided sufficient protection for employees, taking into account the various submissions and the provisions of the Act. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the Laminex Launceston Branch Agreement 2016.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Laminex Launceston Branch Agreement 2016, finding it to be a valid single interest enterprise agreement that complied with the procedural requirements and provided adequate employee protection. The Commission's decision was based on a comprehensive review of the submissions and the legal framework governing enterprise agreements.

Laminex Group Pty Limited

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established