Kusno and Kusno (No. 3)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 443
•15 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kusno and Kusno (No. 3) [2018] FamCA 443
[2018] FamCA 443
15 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of *Kusno and Kusno (No. 3)* concerned an application made by the wife in proceedings before Foster J of the Family Court of Australia. The specific nature of the dispute leading to this application is not detailed in the provided text, beyond it being an "Application in a Case filed 28 July 2017".
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of costs associated with the wife's application. The court was required to decide on the basis and quantum of these costs.
Foster J ordered that the husband pay the wife’s costs of and incidental to the application. These costs were to be on a party/party basis. The parties were given one month to agree on the quantum of these costs; failing agreement, the costs were to be assessed.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of costs associated with the wife's application. The court was required to decide on the basis and quantum of these costs.
Foster J ordered that the husband pay the wife’s costs of and incidental to the application. These costs were to be on a party/party basis. The parties were given one month to agree on the quantum of these costs; failing agreement, the costs were to be assessed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Kusno and Kusno (No. 3) [2018] FamCA 443
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
2
Kusno and Kusno (No. 2)
[2018] FamCA 242
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4