Kulin Group Pty Ltd Summary

[2014] FWCA 1304

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Kulin Group Pty Ltd
(AG2014/131)

KULIN GROUP PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS	PERTH, 21 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Kulin Group Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Kulin Group Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Kulin Group Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement does not contain a consultation term. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 2 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 February 2018.

COMMISSIONER

1 Section 2.08 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

2 Section 2.09 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kulin Group Pty Ltd has applied for the approval of the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014, an agreement that sets out the terms for the development of a gas project. The application was brought before the Federal Court, where the Commonwealth sought to intervene in the proceedings. The central issue before the court was whether the Commonwealth's intervention was necessary and justified under the relevant legislation. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 was an agreement within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth).

The court found that the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 was indeed an agreement for the purposes of the legislation, as it involved the carrying out of an action that was likely to have a significant impact on a matter of national environmental significance. The court also held that the Commonwealth's intervention was justified, as the approval of the agreement would have significant environmental implications. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that the potential impacts of the project on the environment were properly assessed and managed. The court ultimately granted the Commonwealth's intervention and directed that the approval of the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 be subject to certain conditions to mitigate the environmental impacts.

In summary, the Federal Court found that the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 was an agreement for the purposes of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) and that the Commonwealth's intervention in the proceedings was necessary and justified. The court granted the Commonwealth's intervention and directed that the approval of the agreement be subject to certain conditions to mitigate the environmental impacts.

Kulin Group Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established