Krish and Shah
Case
•
[2016] FamCA 116
•15 February 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Krish and Shah [2016] FamCA 116
[2016] FamCA 116
15 February 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Krish and Shah, heard before Hannam J, the dispute concerned interim orders relating to the welfare and living arrangements of two children, C and D. The court was required to determine the immediate arrangements for the children's residence, time spent with each parent, and measures to prevent their removal from Australia.
The court ordered that the children would live with the mother and spend limited, supervised time with the father each weekend. Specific conditions were imposed on the father's time with the children, including the location of changeovers and a prohibition on taking them to his home. Crucially, the court issued a long-term injunction restraining either parent from removing the children from Australia, requesting their placement on the Airport Watch List until they reach adulthood or the court orders otherwise.
The court also directed the parties to participate in a Child Responsive Program with a Family Consultant, with the mother responsible for facilitating the children's attendance. An interpreter was requested to assist the mother during this session. The father was ordered to provide all of the children's clothing and personal belongings to the mother. The court noted that, in the absence of specific interim orders regarding parental responsibility, both parents retained parental responsibility under section 61C of the Family Law Act.
The court ordered that the children would live with the mother and spend limited, supervised time with the father each weekend. Specific conditions were imposed on the father's time with the children, including the location of changeovers and a prohibition on taking them to his home. Crucially, the court issued a long-term injunction restraining either parent from removing the children from Australia, requesting their placement on the Airport Watch List until they reach adulthood or the court orders otherwise.
The court also directed the parties to participate in a Child Responsive Program with a Family Consultant, with the mother responsible for facilitating the children's attendance. An interpreter was requested to assist the mother during this session. The father was ordered to provide all of the children's clothing and personal belongings to the mother. The court noted that, in the absence of specific interim orders regarding parental responsibility, both parents retained parental responsibility under section 61C of the Family Law Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Krish and Shah [2016] FamCA 116
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
Goode & Goode
[2006] FamCA 1346
SS & AH
[2010] FamCAFC 13
George & George
[2013] FamCAFC 182