Kovacs and Graham (No 2)

The appeals in Kovacs and Graham (No 2) involved multiple appeals concerning parenting orders made in relation to the children of the parties. The primary judge had made a number of final and interim parenting orders, which the applicants challenged on various grounds, including alleged errors in the consideration of evidence and procedural fairness. The applicants sought to appeal final and interim orders made by the primary judge in the Family Court. The applicants argued that the primary judge failed to properly consider certain evidence and had not acted fairly in the proceedings.

The court examined whether the primary judge had made any errors in the consideration of evidence or procedural fairness, and whether the applicants had established any grounds for appeal. The applicants contended that the primary judge had not adequately considered their evidence and had given insufficient weight to certain factors. They also argued that the primary judge was biased against them. The court found that no appealable error had been established in the final orders, and that the applicants had not demonstrated any grounds for appeal in relation to the interim orders. The court also found that the appeals in relation to the interim orders lacked utility and were vexatious and oppressive.

The court dismissed the appeals concerning the final orders, as no appealable error had been established. The court also dismissed the applications for leave to appeal in relation to the interim orders, finding that they lacked utility and were vexatious and oppressive. The court made no order as to costs. The appeals were dismissed, and the orders of the primary judge were upheld.