Kostov v Zhang (No 2)
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 279
•14 October 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kostov v Zhang (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 279
[2016] NSWCA 279
14 October 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by Ms Kostov for leave to appeal an interlocutory decision. The respondents were Mr Zhang and others. The application was heard by Meagher and Payne JJA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant Ms Kostov leave to appeal an interlocutory decision. This determination would necessarily involve considering the merits of the proposed appeal and whether it met the threshold for granting leave.
The Court of Appeal, exercising its discretion pursuant to section 98 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW), dismissed Ms Kostov's summons for leave to appeal. The Court ordered that Ms Kostov pay the first and third respondents' costs of the summons in the lump sum of $15,000.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant Ms Kostov leave to appeal an interlocutory decision. This determination would necessarily involve considering the merits of the proposed appeal and whether it met the threshold for granting leave.
The Court of Appeal, exercising its discretion pursuant to section 98 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW), dismissed Ms Kostov's summons for leave to appeal. The Court ordered that Ms Kostov pay the first and third respondents' costs of the summons in the lump sum of $15,000.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Kostov v Zhang (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 279
Most Recent Citation
Pesec v Consolidated Builders Ltd (No 7) [2022] ACTSC 244
Cases Citing This Decision
34
Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd (No 2)
[2022] NSWCA 39
Kostov v Zhang (No 3)
[2018] NSWCA 83
Sweeten v Haggerty (No 2)
[2025] NSWSC 897
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
2
Rinehart v Welker
[2012] NSWCA 1
Hogan v Australian Crime Commission
[2010] HCA 21