FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Konteh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1257
ISHMAEL SHERRIFF KONTEH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 559 OF 2005
MADGWICK J
6 SEPTEMBER 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 559 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
ISHMAEL SHERRIFF KONTEH
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER:
6 SEPTEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceedings be dismissed pursuant to Order 35A rules 2(1)(b) and 3(1)(a).
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 559 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
ISHMAEL SHERRIFF KONTEH
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
MADGWICK J
DATE:
6 SEPTEMBER 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MADGWICK J:
It seems highly probable that these proceedings have become moot as the applicant has now been granted a bridging visa and released from immigration detention. Those latter events occurred after judgment had been reserved in the matter.
The applicant has today failed to attend a directions hearing, despite notification to him of it, and the respondent applies for an order that the proceeding be dismissed.
Bearing in mind that any order I make can be set aside if my understanding of the matter proves to be incorrect, I will make the order sought.
In the circumstances the respondent does not seek an order for costs and accordingly no order for costs will be made.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick. Associate:
Dated: 8 September 2005
Solicitor for the Applicant: There was no appearance from the applicant Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 6 September 2005 Date of Judgment: 6 September 2005
- AGLC
- Konteh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1257
- Case
- [2005] FCA 1257
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the Minister's decision to cancel the applicant's visa was lawful, reasonable, and justified. The applicant argued that the decision was based on insufficient evidence and failed to consider relevant mitigating factors, such as his rehabilitation and community contributions. The court had to determine whether the Minister's decision was made in accordance with the Migration Act and whether there was a procedural error or an error of law in the decision-making process.
The court examined the evidence provided to the Minister and assessed the proportionality of the decision to cancel the visa. It was found that the Minister's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that there was no procedural error or error of law. The court held that the Minister's assessment of the applicant's conduct and its impact on his suitability to remain in Australia was reasonable. Given the applicant's involvement in criminal activities and the seriousness of the offences, the court concluded that the Minister's decision was justified and lawful. As a result, the proceedings were dismissed, and the visa cancellation stood.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The proceedings be dismissed pursuant to Order 35A rules 2(1)(b) and 3(1)(a).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MADGWICK J
Full text does not contain this section.