Kmart Australia Limited v Marmara (No 2)
Case
•
[2025] NSWCA 48
•28 March 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kmart Australia Limited v Marmara (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 48
[2025] NSWCA 48
28 March 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Kmart Australia Limited sought to vary a costs order previously made by the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The application to vary the costs order was brought out of time.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant leave to Kmart Australia Limited to bring its application to vary the costs order out of time, and if so, whether the application itself had merit.
The Court of Appeal found that the application to vary the costs order lacked merit. Consequently, the Court dismissed Kmart Australia Limited's notice of motion, ordering that it pay the costs of the application.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant leave to Kmart Australia Limited to bring its application to vary the costs order out of time, and if so, whether the application itself had merit.
The Court of Appeal found that the application to vary the costs order lacked merit. Consequently, the Court dismissed Kmart Australia Limited's notice of motion, ordering that it pay the costs of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Limitation Periods
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Joseph v Spencer (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 138
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
1
Aukuso v Tahan (No 2)
[2018] NSWCA 302
Bailey v Marinoff
[1971] HCA 49