Klinge & Co Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 1476


[2013] FWCA 1476

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Klinge & Co Pty Ltd
(AG2013/4902)

KLINGE & CO PTY LTD (OLYMPIC DAM OPERATIONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Manufacturing and associated industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN

ADELAIDE, 8 MARCH 2013

Application for approval of the Klinge & Co Pty Ltd (Olympic Dam Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Klinge & Co Pty Ltd (Olympic Dam Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Klinge & Co Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The employer has provided an undertaking in the following terms:

    “1. In the event of any future change to roster to provide employees covered by the agreement 7 days notice of any intended roster change together with a comprehensive financial analysis which demonstrates that the remuneration and conditions of the changed roster are more favourable overall when compared to the modern award.

    2. All employees under the agreement are engaged on the basis that the Point of Hire is Roxby Downs.”

[3] As a result, the above undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A full copy of the advice provided by the employer is attached to the Agreement as Attachment A.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 March 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE400200  PR534656>

Details
AGLC
Klinge & Co Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1476
Case
[2013] FWCA 1476
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of the Fair Work Commission, the applicant, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union, sought approval of the Klinge & Co Pty Ltd (Olympic Dam Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2012. The dispute centred around whether the enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it had been fairly negotiated. The Commission was tasked with ensuring the agreement did not adversely affect employees and met the standards set by the Act.

The primary legal issues for the Commission to address were whether the enterprise agreement provided for the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act, including minimum wages and conditions, and whether it had been genuinely negotiated. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for procedural fairness and whether it complied with the provisions of the Act regarding the process of approval.

The Commission determined that the enterprise agreement was compliant with the Act and had been fairly negotiated. The Commission found that the agreement contained all the minimum terms and conditions stipulated by the Act and provided for procedural fairness. It was concluded that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated, as evidenced by the participation of both parties in the negotiation process and the presence of a fair and transparent process. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding it to be in the best interests of the employees and compliant with the requirements of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Klinge & Co Pty Ltd (Olympic Dam Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2012, affirming its compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and its genuine negotiation. The Commission's decision was based on its finding that the agreement met all the minimum terms and conditions set by the Act, provided for procedural fairness, and was in the best interests of the employees. The approval was granted, and the enterprise agreement was deemed valid and enforceable.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.