| [2014] FWCA 6166 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Klenner Murphy Electrical Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7279)
KLENNER MURPHY ELECTRICAL PTY LTD MORETON BAY RAIL PROJECT WORKS AGREEMENT 2014
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 5 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Klenner Murphy Electrical Pty Ltd Moreton Bay Rail Project Works Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Klenner Murphy Electrical Pty Ltd Moreton Bay Rail Project Works Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 f the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Klenner Murphy Electrical Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the employee organisation, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1), it will operate from 12 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 August 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE409963 PR555128>
- AGLC
- Klenner Murphy Electrical Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 6166
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6166
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the terms of the Works Agreement were in compliance with relevant legislation and whether they adequately protected the interests of the employees represented by the ETU. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement's provisions on wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions met the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009.
The court reviewed the provisions of the Works Agreement against the statutory benchmarks provided by the Fair Work Act. It found that the agreement provided for fair wages and conditions that were consistent with the industrial instruments applicable to the industry. The court also considered the ETU's concerns and assessed whether the agreement provided adequate protections for its members. Ultimately, the court was satisfied that the agreement met the legal requirements and did not disadvantage the employees. Consequently, the application was approved.
The court's decision confirmed that the Works Agreement was valid and binding, paving the way for the completion of the electrical works as planned. The court ordered that the Works Agreement be approved and implemented as per its terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.