Kirwan v Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 3119
•1 November 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kirwan v Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd [2019] FCCA 3119
[2019] FCCA 3119
1 November 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Kirwan v Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd concerned a dispute brought before Judge Mercuri in the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales. The applicant, Mr. Kirwan, alleged that his former employer, Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd, had underpaid him wages and failed to provide payment in lieu of notice upon the termination of his employment. The claim was brought under the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 and involved consideration of the National Employment Standards.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether Mr. Kirwan had been correctly remunerated according to the terms of the applicable award and the National Employment Standards, and whether Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd was liable for payment in lieu of notice upon the termination of his employment. The court was required to interpret the relevant award provisions and the statutory minimum entitlements to determine the extent of any underpayment and the validity of the notice period provided.
Judge Mercuri found that Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd had indeed underpaid Mr. Kirwan in contravention of the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 and the National Employment Standards. The court determined that the employer had failed to provide the correct entitlements regarding wages and that the notice period provided was insufficient. Consequently, the court ordered Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd to pay Mr. Kirwan the sum of $10,000, representing the total amount of underpaid wages and payment in lieu of notice.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether Mr. Kirwan had been correctly remunerated according to the terms of the applicable award and the National Employment Standards, and whether Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd was liable for payment in lieu of notice upon the termination of his employment. The court was required to interpret the relevant award provisions and the statutory minimum entitlements to determine the extent of any underpayment and the validity of the notice period provided.
Judge Mercuri found that Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd had indeed underpaid Mr. Kirwan in contravention of the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 and the National Employment Standards. The court determined that the employer had failed to provide the correct entitlements regarding wages and that the notice period provided was insufficient. Consequently, the court ordered Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd to pay Mr. Kirwan the sum of $10,000, representing the total amount of underpaid wages and payment in lieu of notice.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Wollermann v Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 443
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
3