Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust v Sutherland Shire Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1249


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust v Sutherland Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1249
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 May 2017
Date of orders: 23 May 2017
Decision date: 23 May 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitor:
Mr J Hones, Hones Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms J Maree, Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/328312
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal be upheld.

  2. Leave be granted to the Applicant to rely upon the following plans and documents:

Plan number

Reference

Prepared by

Date

A0101 Revision B

Proposed Site Plan

Liquid Design

Amended 2 September 2016

A1000 Revision A

Demolition Lower Ground

Liquid Design

Amended 22 August 2016

A1001 Revision A

Demolition Upper Ground

Liquid Design

Amended 22 August 2016

A1002 Revision A

Demolition Roof Plan

Liquid Design

Amended 22 August 2016

A1010 Revision A

Demolition North and East Elevations

Liquid Design

Amended 22 August 2016

A1011 Revision A

Demolition South and West Elevations

Liquid Design

Amended 22 August 2016

A9550 Revision A

Playground Sun and Shading

Liquid Design

14 December 2016

A1100 Revision E

Proposed Lower Ground

Liquid Design

Amended 14 December 2016

A1101 Revision F

Proposed Upper Ground

Liquid Design

Amended 22 March 2017

A1102 Revision C

Proposed Roof

Liquid Design

Amended 8 September 2016

Sheet L01 Revision 2

Landscape Masterplan Upper Level

Edible Kids Gardens

16 December 2016

Sheet L02 Revision 2

Landscape Masterplan Lower Ground Level

Edible Kids Gardens

16 December 2016

Sheet L03 Revision2

Planting and Maintenance Plan Upper Level

Edible Kids Gardens

16 December 2016

A3000 Revision D

Proposed North and East Elevations

Liquid Design

Amended 14 December 2016

Plan number

Reference

Prepared by

Date

A3001 Revision D

Proposed South and West Elevations

Liquid Design

Amended 14 December 2016

A3100 Revision C

Proposed Sections 1

Liquid Designs

Amended 30 August 2016

A3101 Revision B

Proposed Sections 2

Liquid Designs

Amended 30 August 2016

A7001 Revision A

Kitchen, Laundry, Prep Kitch and Toilet Plans

Liquid Designs

Amended 22 August 2016

GO160602 Issue B Drawing C1

Coversheet and Notes

ACOR Consultants

Amended 24 August 2016

GO160602 Issue B Drawing C2

Stormwater Management Plan

ACOR Consultants

Amended 24 August 2016

GO160602 Issue B Drawing C3

Stormwater Management Plan – Roof Layout

ACOR Consultants

Amended 24 August 2016

GO160602 Issue B Drawing C4

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 1

ACOR Consultants

Amended 24 August 2016

Plan of Management

Plan of Management

16 May 2017

Acoustic Assessment Report

Acoustic Assessment Report

N G Childs and Associates

22 August 2016

  1. Pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the applicant is to pay those costs of the consent authority, namely the respondent, that are thrown away as a result of amending the development application in the fixed amount of $2,000.00.

  2. Development Consent be granted to DA16/1170 for alterations and additions to an existing commercial car yard to create a child care centre for 174 children at 112-114 Oak Road, Kirrawee, subject to the Conditions in Annexure “A”.

……………………….

Commissioner Chilcott

328312.16 Chilcott - Plans (19.8 MB, pdf)

328312.16 Chilcott (C) (365 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust v Sutherland Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1249
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1249
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust v Sutherland Shire Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute involved the Kirrawee Childcare Unit Trust, the plaintiff, and the Sutherland Shire Council, the defendant. The Trust sought an injunction and damages due to alleged breaches of a development agreement concerning the construction and operation of a childcare facility in Kirrawee. The Trust claimed that the Council had failed to provide necessary approvals and permits, which hindered the development and operation of the childcare centre.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the Sutherland Shire Council had breached the terms of the development agreement and whether the Trust was entitled to an injunction and damages as a result. The Trust argued that the Council's failure to provide timely approvals and permits constituted a breach of the agreement, which in turn impeded the Trust's ability to operate the childcare facility as intended. The Council, on the other hand, contended that it had acted within its powers and that there was no breach of the development agreement.

The court considered the terms of the development agreement and the obligations of both parties under it. It examined the evidence presented regarding the Council's actions and the impact of those actions on the Trust's operations. The court found that the Council had indeed breached the development agreement by not providing the necessary approvals and permits in a timely manner, thereby affecting the Trust's ability to operate the childcare facility. As a result, the court granted the Trust an injunction to compel the Council to fulfil its obligations and awarded damages to compensate for the losses incurred due to the Council's breaches.

The final orders included an injunction requiring the Council to issue the necessary approvals and permits without further delay, as well as an award of damages to the Trust for the losses suffered due to the Council's breaches of the development agreement. The court's decision underscored the importance of adhering to the terms of development agreements and the potential consequences for failing to do so.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.