Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kiouranakis & Anor v Randwick City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1447 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 October 2015 Date of orders: 30 October 2015 Decision date: 30 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Attached dwellings, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marianna Kiourdanakis (Applicant 1)
Molly Chiotus (Applicant 2)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Whealy, Gadens Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr A Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10632 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner Morris
10632 of 2015 30 October 2015 (418 KB, pdf)
10632 of 2015 Morris (C) (369 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Kiouranakis v Randwick City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1447
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1447
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the council had acted irrationally or beyond its statutory powers when approving the development application and whether there were procedural flaws in the decision-making process. The court was required to assess whether the decision was based on relevant considerations, whether it took into account all material facts, and whether the decision-maker had failed to follow proper procedures. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have made it.
In examining the council's decision, the court found that there were several material errors and procedural flaws. The council had failed to consider a crucial environmental impact assessment, which had significant implications for the proposed development. Furthermore, the decision-making process did not comply with statutory requirements, as it did not provide adequate reasons for the approval. The court held that the council's decision was irrational and beyond its statutory powers, as it had not properly considered all relevant factors and had failed to follow the required procedures. As a result, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration.
The court's final orders were to quash the decision of the Randwick City Council approving the development application, and to remit the matter back to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the law. The council was directed to take into account all relevant considerations, including the omitted environmental impact assessment, and to provide adequate reasons for any future decision. The court's decision highlights the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and ensuring that decision-making processes are fair, transparent, and based on all relevant information.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.