Kingsford & Kingsford
Case
•
[2012] FamCA 889
•19 October 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
KINGSFORD & KINGSFORD
[2012] FamCA 889
[2012] FamCA 889
19 October 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case concerned a dispute between a mother and father regarding the childhood vaccinations of their child, T. The matter came before Bennett J.
The court was required to determine the extent to which the child T should be immunised, and the process by which any recommended vaccinations should be administered, considering the differing views of the parents. The court also had to consider the future immunisation of the child, including the Human Papillomavirus vaccine.
Bennett J ordered that the child T receive all childhood vaccinations recommended by Dr J of the Royal Children’s Hospital, to be brought up to date with the National Immunisation Program Schedule. The court further ordered that the child continue to receive future recommended immunisations under the program, with the exception of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine, for which liberty to apply was reserved. Detailed provisions were made for the process of obtaining recommendations, administering vaccinations, and the responsibilities of each parent and medical professionals involved, including the father being responsible for costs and the mother providing the child's health record. The court also directed the independent children's lawyer to provide copies of the order and reasons to specified medical professionals.
The court was required to determine the extent to which the child T should be immunised, and the process by which any recommended vaccinations should be administered, considering the differing views of the parents. The court also had to consider the future immunisation of the child, including the Human Papillomavirus vaccine.
Bennett J ordered that the child T receive all childhood vaccinations recommended by Dr J of the Royal Children’s Hospital, to be brought up to date with the National Immunisation Program Schedule. The court further ordered that the child continue to receive future recommended immunisations under the program, with the exception of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine, for which liberty to apply was reserved. Detailed provisions were made for the process of obtaining recommendations, administering vaccinations, and the responsibilities of each parent and medical professionals involved, including the father being responsible for costs and the mother providing the child's health record. The court also directed the independent children's lawyer to provide copies of the order and reasons to specified medical professionals.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
KINGSFORD & KINGSFORD
[2012] FamCA 889
Most Recent Citation
Ingate & Swinton [2022] FedCFamC1F 222
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Rilak & Tsocas (No 8)
[2015] FamCA 1235
Makinen & Taube
[2021] FCCA 1878
Landis and Landis
[2013] FCCA 2413
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1