Kimberley Oil Nl/Martha Borinelli and Others on behalf of the Yued People/State of Western Australia
Case
•
[2005] NNTTA 79
•24 October 2005
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kimberley Oil Nl/Martha Borinelli and Others on behalf of the Yued People/State of Western Australia [2005] NNTTA 79
[2005] NNTTA 79
24 October 2005
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Kimberley Oil Nl v Martha Borinelli and Others on behalf of the Yued People involved a dispute over a petroleum exploration permit application over native title land. The named applicants, Kimberley Oil Nl, sought a determination that a future act, specifically the grant of a petroleum exploration permit, could be carried out. The respondents, Martha Borinelli and others on behalf of the Yued People, were native title parties who had not signed an agreement with the applicant company. The State of Western Australia also participated in the proceedings.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the native title parties, despite not being signatories to the agreement, could consent to the future act and if such consent would allow the court to make a determination permitting the grant of the permit. The court had to consider the statutory framework governing native title determinations and the effect of consent from native title parties, even if not all parties had signed the agreement.
The court found that the native title parties as a whole could provide the necessary consent for the future act, even though not all parties had signed the agreement. The court held that the consent of the native title parties as a whole was sufficient to permit the determination that the act could be carried out. The court also noted that the statutory provisions allowed for such a determination when the native title parties, as a collective, agreed to the future act. Consequently, the court granted the determination that the act of granting the petroleum exploration permit could be done.
The final orders of the court permitted the grant of the petroleum exploration permit, based on the consent of the native title parties as a whole. The determination was made in accordance with the statutory requirements, and the court's decision facilitated the applicant company's ability to proceed with its exploration activities on the native title land.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the native title parties, despite not being signatories to the agreement, could consent to the future act and if such consent would allow the court to make a determination permitting the grant of the permit. The court had to consider the statutory framework governing native title determinations and the effect of consent from native title parties, even if not all parties had signed the agreement.
The court found that the native title parties as a whole could provide the necessary consent for the future act, even though not all parties had signed the agreement. The court held that the consent of the native title parties as a whole was sufficient to permit the determination that the act could be carried out. The court also noted that the statutory provisions allowed for such a determination when the native title parties, as a collective, agreed to the future act. Consequently, the court granted the determination that the act of granting the petroleum exploration permit could be done.
The final orders of the court permitted the grant of the petroleum exploration permit, based on the consent of the native title parties as a whole. The determination was made in accordance with the statutory requirements, and the court's decision facilitated the applicant company's ability to proceed with its exploration activities on the native title land.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law
Legal Concepts
-
Native Title
-
Consent
-
Constitutional Validity
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Martha Borinelli and Ors (Yued People); Raymond Dann and Ors (Amangu People)/ Western Australia/Empire Oil Company (WA) Limited [2007] NNTTA 9
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Martha Borinelli & Ors (Yued People); Raymond Dann & Ors (Amangu People)/ Western Australia/Empire Oil Company (WA) Limited
[2007] NNTTA 9
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Monkey Mia Dolphin Resort Pty Ltd v Western Australia
[2001] NNTTA 50
Monkey Mia Dolphin Resort Pty Ltd v Western Australia
[2001] NNTTA 50