KIM (Migration)
Case
•
[2023] AATA 1402
•28 April 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
KIM (Migration) [2023] AATA 1402
[2023] AATA 1402
28 April 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa, Subclass 187, Direct Entry stream, by an applicant seeking to work as a Metal Fabricator. The decision under review, which was affirmed by the Tribunal, was the refusal to grant the visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the requirements of clause 187.233 of the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause mandates, among other things, that the nominated position must be located in regional Australia, that the nomination application must have been approved and not subsequently withdrawn, and that the applicant must be identified in the nomination application where it was made on or after 1 July 2017.
The Tribunal found that the nomination application lodged by Dongmun Greentec Pty Ltd on behalf of the applicant had not been approved at the time of the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the applicant failed to satisfy the requirements of clause 187.233. As the applicant had only sought to satisfy the criteria for the Direct Entry stream and had not met those requirements, the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the requirements of clause 187.233 of the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause mandates, among other things, that the nominated position must be located in regional Australia, that the nomination application must have been approved and not subsequently withdrawn, and that the applicant must be identified in the nomination application where it was made on or after 1 July 2017.
The Tribunal found that the nomination application lodged by Dongmun Greentec Pty Ltd on behalf of the applicant had not been approved at the time of the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the applicant failed to satisfy the requirements of clause 187.233. As the applicant had only sought to satisfy the criteria for the Direct Entry stream and had not met those requirements, the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the visa.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
KIM (Migration) [2023] AATA 1402
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2002] FCA 617
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2012] FMCA 28
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18